[squid-users] AUFS vs. DISKS

[Yuri Voinov]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
 


15.07.15 17:18, FredB пишет:
>
>> Your are right fred,
>>
>> It is is a difficult deal for us too...
>>
>> aufs -> good speed but more troubles ( assertion failed, "empty()",
>> HTTP
>> reply without date.... unstable rock system ) and must deal with
>> squid
>> crashes ( watchdog)
>
>
> You mean "rock store" or aufs ?
> For me aufs seems stable too but slower than diskd after a point,
something like beyond 400 r/s
>
> Rock store was very unstable -> Again, my tests are not very recent,
do you make a try with 3.5.x ?
>
> I found this, my exact value was --with-aufs-threads=128, but
"squidaio_queue_request: WARNING - Queue congestion" was just less
present ...
>
>>
>> diskd -> more stable but slower...
Just use fast separate physical devices on separate controllers - and
all will be ok without any delays.

>>
>>
>>
>
> Very very stable, no error, no warning
>
> _______________________________________________
> squid-users mailing list
> squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org
> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
 
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVpkIfAAoJENNXIZxhPexGwZ4H/ikmHKulsvCaAp/0tYjheqzM
CuaFKSi0ZB+E4a/mX9SbfkXkU+M/soVmZoz0pMVZTOH/EzpfQuRTbWcK7AMBda7v
N7lyblQuDlqlJHWxE2KbKnRg5EYKSgSBusPrCeVsIfml2jHdkUXnS5XukcofQlwE
CFFGNTMVVZVxPZJLM8INwDUoSY2nH9xVp64oKp6CEU5nmsbSQ0yVUymCK6FPga51
xJnGj0R92pHgQcQSdKjvXSFVL3i1AdRex2hbJhwobQl4pEdFnUoVbZ4xNBtWB/eY
g4aUNTEHoCIUQm+3LBO1nNks6VQ+gGwJDmZ2fOGNn2VgDOINUPx4i4ZKZn0c6rY=
=bVts
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----