[squid-users] AUFS vs. DISKS

[FredB]

> Your are right fred,
> 
> It is is a difficult deal for us too...
> 
> aufs -> good speed but more troubles ( assertion failed, "empty()",
> HTTP
> reply without date.... unstable rock system ) and must deal with
> squid
> crashes ( watchdog)


You mean "rock store" or aufs ? 
For me aufs seems stable too but slower than diskd after a point, something like beyond 400 r/s 

Rock store was very unstable -> Again, my tests are not very recent, do you make a try with 3.5.x ? 

I found this, my exact value was --with-aufs-threads=128, but "squidaio_queue_request: WARNING - Queue congestion" was just less present ...

> 
> diskd -> more stable but slower...
> 
> 

Very very stable, no error, no warning