[squid-users] Squid4 has extremely low hit ratio due to lacks of ignore-no-cache

[Yuri Voinov]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
 
Here is one day Squid 4 working statistics (by Calamaris):

http://i.imgur.com/XeYRWbY.png

It's about nothing. Squid 3 in bad days easy achieves 35%....

26.10.15 23:34, Alex Rousskov пишет:
> On 10/26/2015 11:19 AM, Yuri Voinov wrote:
>
>> 4.0.1 has more than 4 times
>> bigger mem_cache, 1 Gb. 1st example 3.5.10 has only 256 Mbytes. This is
>> the reason of miss??????
>
> Please see my previous email if you want to improve your chances of
> getting a correct answer to that and other related questions.
>
> In summary: Squid logs why it made an immediate-hit, immediate-miss, or
> revalidate-and-then-decide decision. There are approximately 100 factors
> that affect that decision. If you want folks to speculate, keep posting
> questions. If you want an answer, collect and share those logs.
>
>
> And, yes, Squid needs a better interface for triaging caching decisions
> than studying detailed cache.logs. You already know what to do to add
> that very useful feature:
>
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/AboutSquid#How_to_add_a_new_Squid_feature.2C_enhance.2C_of_fix_something.3F
>
>
> Alex.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
 
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWLmhDAAoJENNXIZxhPexGMLsIAMyu9d2GGuXT5GgEcFt3qoMT
EKNnaj11h4QP0KIwyty/wh9eHeC8yan940B0DZ4Ne1MmJANrC98dGN1srfdHPdsj
haEEYInjpcgfg5vdWjR6ZDx0hupOCp3rBrRNl6Dj1/2JhXY736L6VppaBJt1suUn
ya+x8JDRpNGv3rHmK/WgWZ5wkCPTbFGosupeBZtaF8BDih8NGer3wXcGGge5Mscg
z6cMPL1NVhm9mQgUdNeVvdBvXpn8d/brGK79ahf44kTaZtPA2rticrhiL1HlF21x
lJqdt8U0FDG3AjEbSYY97qmcEd1TgmzLwgsgy8p8mx0W7muOhQH4CIgzpPXRPg4=
=JlBa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----