[squid-users] Squid4 has extremely low hit ratio due to lacks of ignore-no-cache

[Yuri Voinov]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
 
This should be understood as "Life Saving handiwork of drowning." Or "We
change something, but you sort it out, how to fix it, it's the Open
Source, baby";)

So, finally, there is no answer.

PS. If developers do not know - the more we do not know and can not know.

26.10.15 23:34, Alex Rousskov пишет:
> On 10/26/2015 11:19 AM, Yuri Voinov wrote:
>
>> 4.0.1 has more than 4 times
>> bigger mem_cache, 1 Gb. 1st example 3.5.10 has only 256 Mbytes. This is
>> the reason of miss??????
>
> Please see my previous email if you want to improve your chances of
> getting a correct answer to that and other related questions.
>
> In summary: Squid logs why it made an immediate-hit, immediate-miss, or
> revalidate-and-then-decide decision. There are approximately 100 factors
> that affect that decision. If you want folks to speculate, keep posting
> questions. If you want an answer, collect and share those logs.
>
>
> And, yes, Squid needs a better interface for triaging caching decisions
> than studying detailed cache.logs. You already know what to do to add
> that very useful feature:
>
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/AboutSquid#How_to_add_a_new_Squid_feature.2C_enhance.2C_of_fix_something.3F
>
>
> Alex.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
 
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWLmbcAAoJENNXIZxhPexG7GAIAKYIXePUCf5oGIPaOyRV8WAt
jkmfS7jXf+B0eFq3QBMs6yVfinc2N8TVeN68zEYcXyBuTacr3sV2dcqr23lU2VR/
D9+mp7Q9lg3MnSBlPoRe6R69//Wc3ihl7yOVQNdFLrCDLHg7XlKWf8+0VbNcW9Zs
PMwv/p40tmvQLzJvjtEvgy7BMN7ZUSruHPO5r24kDRs6GAiz5Fqhq6Gen7ZvdaRj
K5XMpW7CdMG5LAHHmbAiGlFutCPJd7RuMwMNfPJ0hotw3QMwn3xksSt1LPoX+uYh
WbHCMgpM6yTuyT58nlZpnK1I9kg525pTxJWI7zTn+n4L+/NVqiPDHgD4QCeYNOk=
=LGMy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----