[squid-users] AUFS vs. DISKS
FredB
fredbmail at free.fr
Wed Jul 15 11:39:05 UTC 2015
> I'm making a test just now
>
> Diskd, 600 r/s, squid CPU usage = 40 %, load average 1, no warning in
> cache/kernel/syslog logs
> Aufs, 600 r/s, squid CPU usage = 45 %, load average 3, many 'Queue
> congestion'
>
> And no gain for hits % of all requests and bytes sent from squid
> cache
>
> Squid 3.4.13 and Debian
> _______________________________________________
Argh ! After some minutes
2015/07/15 13:13:29 kid1| squidaio_queue_request: WARNING - Queue congestion
2015/07/15 13:13:48 kid1| squidaio_queue_request: WARNING - Queue congestion
2015/07/15 13:14:27 kid1| squidaio_queue_request: WARNING - Queue congestion
2015/07/15 13:15:54 kid1| squidaio_queue_request: WARNING - Queue congestion
2015/07/15 13:18:28 kid1| squidaio_queue_request: WARNING - Queue congestion
2015/07/15 13:25:39 kid1| squidaio_queue_request: WARNING - Queue congestion
2015/07/15 13:36:07 kid1| DiskThreadsDiskFile::openDone: (2) No such file or directory
2015/07/15 13:36:07 kid1| /cache2/1F/F9/007DF243
So I go back to diskd
More information about the squid-users
mailing list