[squid-dev] [PATCH] received_encrypted ACL

[Kinkie]

Hi,
  sorry for butting in but I am a bit confused by this discussion, as it
seems to be straying from the technical merit; this is my attempt at
getting back to the core of the topic.

Amos claims that its stated objective can be achieved by other,
already-existing, features, and that it this proposal has a high
false-positive rate.

So in my opinion the easiest way to move the discussion forward is to:
1. find one use-case which cannot be covered by existing features
2a. claim that the false-positive scenarios found by Amos are either
intentional or not incorrect, OR
2b. find ways to reduce the false positives in the scenarios hihglighted by
Amos, OR
2c. rework the existing features (if possible) to allow the "early
detection" which is in my understanding the most touted benefit of the
proposed solution

Am I missing something obvious?

  Kinkie
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-dev/attachments/20150720/82f0afbf/attachment.html>