[squid-users] rock storage and max-swap-rate
rousskov at measurement-factory.com
Mon Jan 22 15:54:36 UTC 2018
On 01/22/2018 02:39 AM, Ivan Larionov wrote:
> What’s wrong with rock on ext4?
ext4 does a lot more than rock needs in most environments. More useless
work usually means more overhead/worse performance. YMMV.
> Which filesystem works better for it?
In most cases, the simpler/dumber the filesystem is, the better. If you
recall, rock's ultimate goal is using a raw disk partition or
equivalent... Rock already does 95+% of what a simple file system does.
More information about the squid-users