[squid-users] Fw: Re: Can`t cache always TCP_MISS

[Dzaczek]

http://codepaste.net/pvx4j1


...
Linux is like wigwam: no Gates, no Windows and Apache inside.



-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Fw: Re: Can`t cache always TCP_MISS
Local Time: 13 maja 2016 2:02 PM
UTC Time: 13 maja 2016 12:02
From: squid3 at treenet.co.nz
To: squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org

On 13/05/2016 10:43 p.m., joe wrote:
> the img link has smale object size the one you post
> i dont know if this has to do with you problem try
>
> 113 cache_dir aufs /squid-cache 65536 128 256
> without min-size=512000
>
> check and see the object size
>
> if you want to control the min size use this instead
> minimum_object_size 0 bytes <--- change to min size u want
>
> first try without min-size=512000 and see if you get hit on smale
> obj

Yes that might be a good test.

Though the way I'm reading that config (and Squid should be) is objects
under 512KB are stored in memory, 512000 bytes - 512KB are store in
either memory or disk, and over-512KB are stored only on disk.


The debug log is indicating that something in the active logic is
explicitly requesting that the object not be stored. The store is not
going on to do any figuring out of whether its cacheable because it has
already been explicitly told not to.

What does the rest of your config contain?
Are you intercepting the traffic and using Google DNS perhapse? that
particular combo can easily make the traffic not cacheable.

Amos

_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org
http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/attachments/20160513/02904f09/attachment.html>