[squid-users] reflecting on Squid Project Status with regard to "Joshua 55" vulnerabilities

[Jonathan Lee]

Hello, thank you for the update Francesso, there is also some chatter about bugs within the Netgate community. Is this also related to the fixes in V7 (please see Redmine attached)?

I  admit, I have a bias and assumption that that Big-Tech does not like Squid functional, and that most of what is listed below was done within a political aspect to generate a confusion within the firewall community. So much so that the package was considered an issue and Netgate started to recommend Squid's removal. I have stood by this package and continue to, as it works beautifully.

This Redmine should have been more concise and simplified within its notes, it seems to just generate confusion.  I do not have issues like this and that is where I start to question what this is related to.  Can Someone please respond to this Redmine for verification that has a higher-level knowledge about Squid? I hate to see this removed for some simple reason like a PHP issue that causes configuration issues.

Bug #14390: Squid: SECURITY ALERT: Host header forgery detected - pfSense Packages - pfSense bugtracker<https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/14390>
Bug #14390: Squid: SECURITY ALERT: Host header forgery detected - pfSense Packages - pfSense bugtracker<https://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/14390>
Redmine
redmine.pfsense.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/attachments/20241031/fa9ecd14/attachment.htm>