[squid-users] [SQUID] Some Web Page never complete download
slagauterie at hotmail.com
slagauterie at hotmail.com
Sat Nov 16 18:07:46 UTC 2024
Hello Eliezer,
I use it as a standard forward proxy. I use a proxy.pac file deployed
via DHCP and DNS WPAD entry. This makes it works easily with browsers.
10 years ago, I was doing both, but Squid was running on a DMZ server.
It was also acting as a firewall and other things.
Now, it is only forward. The main purpose is to prevent kids to access
"wrong site" and remove ads.
Regarding C-ICAP, only squidclamav, connected to a dedicated Clamav
container for virus checking.
Few years ago, ClamAV was in the same container, but for me it breaks a
little bit the "One service" approach of conteiners.
I plan to also use DNSBL. But before, I need to fully understand how it
can help or what it can improve.
Finally, I use ufdbguard instead of squidguard because it is still and
well developed. It is also faster. Its main purpose is for URL
checking. With it I mainly avoid:
- Trackers
- Ads
- Adults
- Violence, aggressive, weapon, etc.
- Warez
The next step will probably be to move ufdbguard out, in its dedicated
container (One service approach).
At the begining, compiling was the main difficulty to produce Docker
images. Then, I learn how to do multi-level image. So I can compile in
one image, and use the result for other images, keeping the final image
as small as possible, without all developper packages.
The main reasons why I currently don't use Squid to intercept are:
- My Docker server is a NAS. So not as powerfull as a real server. I
tend to limit traffic.
- With the bump process and all the TLS approach, too many thing do not
work out of the box for smartphone and their applications... Most of
them are doing Certificate Pinning for example, which is broken by
"standard" bumping and certificate mimic.
Note: I have not yet looked at all C-ICAP modules available. Feel free
to recommend some.
Regards,
Slag
Le samedi 16 novembre 2024 à 17:55 +0200, ngtech1ltd at gmail.com a
écrit :
> Hey Slag,
>
> I want to understand the setup a bit more then what's written
> already.
> The Squid instance you are using, is it a simple forward proxy or an
> interception one?
> The C-ICAP is used with SquidClamAV? Are there any other C-ICAP
> functions you are using?
> What are you using UfdbGuard for?
>
> Thanks,
> Eliezer
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: squid-users <squid-users-bounces at lists.squid-cache.org> On
> Behalf Of slagauterie at hotmail.com
> Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2024 8:15 PM
> To: squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org
> Subject: [squid-users] [SQUID] Some Web Page never complete download
>
> Hello,
>
> This is my first mail to this list, my apologies if things are not
> correct.
>
> I am using squid at home for more than 5 years. Recently I have
> updated my version from version 6.0 (early age) to the latest version
> 6.12.
>
> I am compiling my own binaries and run it in a docker container.
>
> Unfortunately, I am facing an issue with all Squid version above 6.8
> (included).
>
> I have some web sites like www.google.com for which my browser never
> complete the download of the page. There is a pending request to URIs
> like https://www.google.com/xjs/_/js/k=xjs.s.... and after long time
> (timeout) Squid logs a TCP_MISS_ABORTED/200.
>
> I have downgraded till version 6.7, and it works a older version,
> even if the same kind of request ends by a NONE_NONE_ABORTED/000. The
> request does not stay pending.
>
> I can provide more information if it can help to investigate.
>
> Configuration:
> - Squid Version >= 6.8 (Compiled, with bumping configuration and
> certificate mimic)
> - C-ICAP Version 0.6.3 (Compiled)
> - SquidClamAV Version 7.3 (Compiled)
> - UfdbGuard Version 1.35.8 (Compiled)
>
> Thank you for your help.
>
> Regards,
> Slag
> _______________________________________________
> squid-users mailing list
> squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org
> https://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
>
More information about the squid-users
mailing list