[squid-users] Are you using ESI?
Robert Collins
robertc at squid-cache.org
Sat Feb 25 11:26:42 UTC 2023
ESI in Squid hasn't had investment done to it for neigh on twenty years
now. Not a bad run 🙂. I have no idea if there are users out there...
Certainly no one has reached out to me about it for many years.
I think newer models of edge compute like WASM and ICAP are generally
better: narrower interfaces that unlock huge potential.
The implementation in Squid should be savable if folk are interested - I
don't remember it being all that bad - but I certainly don't have time to
offer to do that.
HTH,
Rob
On Fri, 24 Feb 2023 at 23:50, Alex Rousskov <
rousskov at measurement-factory.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> ESI support in Squid has been a significant source of problems for
> many years. One of the biggest problems is affecting a lot of code that
> has nothing to do with the ESI module! I see no signs of a significant
> ESI user base, but some users may still exist. Before proposing to
> remove ESI support from Squid, I would like to better estimate the
> negative impact of that removal on existing Squid installations.
>
> If your Squid installation uses ESI features, please respond (in private
> if necessary). How would ESI removal affect your Squids? Would you be
> willing and able to rewrite the ESI module integration with Squid
> primary APIs (or hire a developer capable of such a serious project)?
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Alex.
> _______________________________________________
> squid-users mailing list
> squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org
> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/attachments/20230225/4267a6cd/attachment.htm>
More information about the squid-users
mailing list