[squid-users] Scaling concurrent TCP sessions beyond ephemeral port range

Alex Rousskov rousskov at measurement-factory.com
Tue Jun 21 21:11:01 UTC 2022


On 6/19/22 12:48, Praveen Ponakanti wrote:

> What is the process to have this code patch upstreamed for future squid 
> versions?

In short, just post a quality pull request on GitHub (or find somebody 
who can guide your code towards official acceptance for you). For 
details, please see https://wiki.squid-cache.org/MergeProcedure


Thank you,

Alex.


> On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 9:31 PM Amos Jeffries <squid3 at treenet.co.nz 
> wrote:
> 
>     On 20/05/22 19:44, Praveen Ponakanti wrote:
>      > Hi Alex,
>      >
>      > Thanks for going through several steps to help mitigate src port
>      > exhaustion. We are looking to achieve 400-500% more
>      > concurrent connections if we could :) as there is a
>     significant buffer
>      > on the available CPU.
> 
>     Then you require at least 4, maybe 5, IP addresses to handle that many
>     concurrent connections with Squid.
> 
> 
> We would like to investigate going beyond the ephemeral port range for 
> some specific destination IP:PORT addresses. For that it appears squid 
> does not round-robin requests if we use multiple tcp_outgoing_addresses. 
> We could use ACL’s to pick a different outbound IP based on the clients 
> source IP, however that is not very ideal in our environment as our 
> clients aren’t always equally split by subnet. However, if we could 
> split by the client’s source port that might help achieve this. For 
> example something like:
> 
> 
> acl pool1 clientport 0-32768
> 
> acl pool2 clientport 32769-65536
> 
> 
> tcp_outgoing_address 10.1.0.1 pool1
> 
> tcp_outgoing_address 10.1.0.2 pool2
> 
> 
> Squid's ACLs currently do not allow filtering by the client's source 
> port. We could look into a separate patch to add this functionality to 
> squid’s ACL code if that makes sense. Or is there a better way to 
> achieve this?
> 
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Praveen
> 
> 
>      > The option to use multiple tcp_outoing_addresses appears to be
>     promising
>      > along with some tweaks to the TCP timeouts. I guess we could use
>     ACLs to
>      > pick a different outbound IP based on the requesting client's
>     prefix. We
>      > had not considered that option as the ephemeral ports were no longer
>      > available to other applications when squid uses most of them with a
>      > single outbound IP configured. We are also looking to modify the
>     code to
>      > use the IP_BIND_ADDRESS_NO_PORT sockopt as that could help delay
>     port
>      > assignment with the bind() call on the outbound TCP sessions (to
>      > hopefully allow access to the 4-tuple on the socket).
> 
>     Patches welcome.
> 
>     However, please be aware that use of the 4-tuple is often no different
>     from the 3-tuple since the dst-port is typically identical for all
>     outgoing traffic to a given dst-IP.
> 
> 
>     Cheers
>     Amos
>     _______________________________________________
>     squid-users mailing list
>     squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org
>     <mailto:squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org>
>     http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
>     <http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> squid-users mailing list
> squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org
> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users



More information about the squid-users mailing list