[squid-users] access_log acls
Matus UHLAR - fantomas
uhlar at fantomas.sk
Wed Nov 28 11:24:30 UTC 2018
On 27.11.18 15:04, Marcus Kool wrote:
>4.5 would be nice. 4.6 would also be nice.
OK, I will rephrase my question: which squid version do you find this in?
>On 27/11/2018 14:47, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>>>>On 11/27/18 5:21 AM, Marcus Kool wrote:
>>>>>logformat combha %>a %ui %un [%tl] "%rm %ru HTTP/%rv" %>Hs %<st %Ss:%Sh %>ha
>>>>>acl src_lb src 10.2.2.254/32
>>>>>acl src_lb src 10.2.2.107/32
>>>>>access_log stdio:/local/squid4/logs/lbaccess.log combha src_lb
>>>>>access_log stdio:/local/squid4/logs/access.log combha !src_lb
>>>>>The logging is almost as expected: all HTTP(S) traffic from 10.2.2.107
>>>>>goes to lbaccess.log and all other traffic to access.log,
>>>>>*but* imitating the TCP probe of the LB with a telnet session from
>>>>>10.2.2.107 to the squid server which is immediately terminated or sends
>>>>>garbage, is logged with transaction-end-before-headers to access.log,
>>>>>not lbaccess.log.
>>>>>Should the above acls send the errors to lbaccess.log?
>>
>>>On 27/11/2018 13:58, Alex Rousskov wrote:
>>>>Yes, src ACLs should work for all transactions associated with to-Squid
>>>>connections, including transaction-end-before-headers errors. If they do
>>>>not work, it is a Squid bug.
>>
>>On 27.11.18 14:42, Marcus Kool wrote:
>>>Thanks, I filed bug 4906: https://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4906
>>>
>>>Is it serious enough to get a fix in Squid 4?
>>
>>which "squid 4" exactly?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar at fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
- Holmes, what kind of school did you study to be a detective?
- Elementary, Watson. -- Daffy Duck & Porky Pig
More information about the squid-users
mailing list