[squid-users] SSL intercept in explicit mode

[Danilo V]

Thanks for the explanation.
Do you have any guide?

Em qua, 14 de mar de 2018 às 10:26, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <
uhlar at fantomas.sk> escreveu:

> On 13.03.18 14:44, Danilo V wrote:
> >I mean SSL bump in explicit mode.
> >So intercept is a essencial requirement for running SSL bump?
>
> No, you asked for "explicit mode with ssl intercept" which I pointed out is
> illogical.
>
>
> >Em ter, 13 de mar de 2018 às 11:10, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <
> >uhlar at fantomas.sk> escreveu:
> >> On 13.03.18 13:44, Danilo V wrote:
> >> >Is it possible/feasible to configure squid in explicit mode with ssl
> >> >intercept?
> >>
> >> maybe you mean SSL bump in explicit mode?
>
> It is possible to bump explicit proxy.
>
> >> >Due to architecture of my network it is not possible to implement
> >> >transparent proxy.
> >>
> >> excuse me?
> >> by "transparent" people mean what we usually call "intercept".
>
> >> >What would be the behavior of applications that dont support proxy -
> i.e.
> >> >dont forward requests to proxy?
> >>
> >> they mest be intercepted.
>
> "must" be intercepted. Since you said that it's not possible transparent (I
> believe you have meant intercepting) proxy, it's apparently not possible to
> handle applications that do not support proxy.
>
> --
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar at fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
> Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
> Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
> 2B|!2B, that's a question!
> _______________________________________________
> squid-users mailing list
> squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org
> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/attachments/20180314/da3190fd/attachment.html>