[squid-users] Compiling with OpenSSL Support

[Matus UHLAR - fantomas]

>>>On 15/10/17 14:17, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>>>>why not libssl-dev?

>>>>On 13.10.17 15:16, Marcus Kool wrote:
>>>>>Debian 9 has openssl 1.1.x while most platforms have older versions.

>On 16/10/17 23:47, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>>>>that means, you should use libssl-dev unless you know squid 
>>>>can't compile
>>>>with openssl-1.1

>>On 15.10.17 18:43, Marcus Kool wrote:
>>>Openssl 1.1.x is not backwards compatible and does not have the symbol
>>>CRYPTO_LOCK_X509 while openssl 1.0.2 has.
>>
>>are you talking about squid or ufdbguard?

On 17.10.17 03:04, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>Doesn't matter, it is a problem with OpenSSL 1.0 vs 1.1.
>Anything which uses OpenSSL 1.0 specific symbols needs libssl1.0-dev 
>on Debian.

so, does squid reauire openssl-1.0? 
ok, found finally:

https://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/CompilingSquid#Debian.2C_Ubuntu

	However, please note that Squid-3.5 is not compatible with OpenSSL
	v1.1+.  As of Debian Squeeze, or Ubuntu Zesty the libssl1.0-dev
	package must be used instead.  This is resolved in the Squid-4
	packages when they become available.

-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar at fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.