[squid-users] IP_FREEBIND or IP_TRANSPARENT support?
Eliezer Croitoru
eliezer at ngtech.co.il
Mon Oct 2 20:46:45 UTC 2017
On what OS?(since it does supports it)
But if you just need a NAT proxy then it's another story.
Eliezer
----
http://ngtech.co.il/lmgtfy/
Linux System Administrator
Mobile: +972-5-28704261
Email: eliezer at ngtech.co.il
From: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-bounces at lists.squid-cache.org] On Behalf Of xpro6000
Sent: Monday, October 2, 2017 21:44
To: squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org
Subject: [squid-users] IP_FREEBIND or IP_TRANSPARENT support?
If one were to assign a whole /64 block of IPv6 IPs to a NIC on Linux then they would use the "ip route add local" method instead of adding each IP in the /etc/network/interfaces file.
>From the testing I have done the IPs that were assigned with the "ip route add local" don't work with Squid and the main reason for this is because Squid does not use IP_FREEBIND or IP_TRANSPARENT option on the socket connection.
You can read more about it here
https://serverfault.com/a/591435/141509
Is there any option in the config file that enables this option?
More information about the squid-users
mailing list