[squid-users] Content injection

[Yuri]

And it's still said softly - it's arrtacted to the ears. Speech, as I
understand it, is about the insertion of advertising banners in the
pages given to clients from the proxy (cache). What are the literary
works and copyright? The insertion of advertising is money, and
considerable. If op is to deduct a portion of the amount for advertising
to site owners (content) - it seems to me that there will be no legal
collision and there is no need to drag here a dead donkey - that is,
forgive, the ancient laws of the early 20th century.

It seems to me that the phrase "HTML can contain" (and may not contain,
and in most cases does not contain - because the Web is bullshit in most
cases) the above - it sounds extremely Jesuit.


02.10.2017 8:47, Amos Jeffries пишет:
> On 02/10/17 02:33, B Hirsch wrote:
>> Any legal references someone could point to?
> >
>
> <http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/text.jsp?file_id=283698>
>
> "HTML" can contain almost any type of work, so it is hard to know in
> advance exactly which of the clauses or exemptions apply.
>
> Amos
> _______________________________________________
> squid-users mailing list
> squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org
> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0x3E3743A7.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 2887 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/attachments/20171002/5bd334cc/attachment.key>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/attachments/20171002/5bd334cc/attachment.sig>