[squid-users] What would be the maximum ufs\aufs cache_dir objects?

[Omid Kosari]

Interesting because i was going to create a new topic like this but Eliezer
read my mind ;)

Nowadays i can see that the http traffic is going fewer and fewer and every
day i am thinking about retiring the squid . 

But currently is see that most of the remaining http traffic which worth
caching is 
Microsoft ( Windows Updates + App Updates ) 
Apple (IOS updates + App Updates )
Game Consoles (Playstation + Xbox + Game Updates )
Google ( Android Apps + Chrome Apps )
Samsung (Firmware Update + AppUpdates )
CDNs (Akamai + llnwd )
Antivirus Updates

The international HTTP traffic is less than 20% of all international traffic
. The sites mentioned above include more than 60% of international http
traffic so they are more than 10% of all international traffic .

Now i prefer to only cache mentioned sites . But each line needs a special
customization like what Eliezer tool for windows updates .

Squid is an advance general caching software/platform and customizing for
each website is far from its roadmap . So i think supporting others like
Eliezer to create custom helpers/services for each website may help Squid be
more popular and active.



--
View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/What-would-be-the-maximum-ufs-aufs-cache-dir-objects-tp4683100p4683213.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.