[squid-users] Chaining icap and ecap services - FATAL: Received Segment Violation...dying.

[Yuri]

13.07.2017 5:13, bugreporter пишет:
> Hi Antony,
>
> If they effectively don't *distribute* their modifications... But we don't
> know. Thank you so much for the clarification.
And in general, making such statements, you need to be ready to prove
them in court.

When you can prove that we are distributing software for commercial
purposes with patches that are not given to the community, then you will
throw such statements.

Until this is proven - I suggest you apologize.
>
> Kind Regards,
>
>
>
> -----
> Bug Reporter Contributor
> OpenSource = Open-Minded
> --
> View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Chaining-icap-and-ecap-services-FATAL-Received-Segment-Violation-dying-tp4683033p4683087.html
> Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> squid-users mailing list
> squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org
> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/attachments/20170713/0413e06b/attachment.sig>