[squid-users] HDD/RAM Capacity vs store_avg_object_size
bugreporter
bugreporter2017 at gmail.com
Wed Jul 12 10:31:34 UTC 2017
Hi,
Can anybody help me to confirm my understanding of the memory usage vs the
persistent cache capacity? Below my understanding:
According to http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/SquidMemory:
1- We need 14 MB of memory per 1 GB on disk for 64-bit Squid.The wiki is
there since I know squid (ie. i'm very old now). Is this information still
valid?
2- Is this assumption based on the default value of 13 KB for
*store_avg_object_size*?
3- If answers to questions above are both YES, can we deduce that we need
*182* bytes in memory per object in the persistent cache on 64x system?
[*182* = (14 * 1024 * 1024) / (1024 * 1024 / store_avg_object_size)]
4- Today the *store_avg_object_size* should be really greater than 13 KB.
The mean object size I can see on my own cache is about 100 KB. Can anybody
refer me to a website where I can find fresh information?
5- If I'm completely on a wrong way, can anybody help me to find a formula
that can help me to deduce the required RAM for a given HDD capacity (and
vice versa).
Warm Regards,
-----
Bug Reporter Contributor
OpenSource = Open-Minded
--
View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/HDD-RAM-Capacity-vs-store-avg-object-size-tp4683072.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the squid-users
mailing list