[squid-users] Squid caching bad objects

[Razor Cross]

Hi Amos,
Do you have any insights on the below issue? Is it fixed on latest squid
release?  Your inputs would be really helpful




On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Razor Cross <bloggerrazorcross at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Alex Rousskov <
> rousskov at measurement-factory.com> wrote:
>
>> On 06/27/2017 10:11 AM, Razor Cross wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Alex Rousskov wrote:
>>
>> >     >I suspect that the COMPLETE_NONPERSISTENT_MSG case in
>> >     >HttpStateData::processReplyBody() should be changed to call
>> >     >StoreEntry::lengthWentBad("missing last-chunk") when lastChunk is
>> false
>> >     >and HttpStateData::flags.chunked is true.
>>
>> >       We are able to reproduce the issue . If server socket is closed
>> > after sending first chunk of data, squid is caching the partial object
>> > even though it did not receive the remaining chunks.
>>
>> If you are not going to fix this yourself, please consider filing a bug
>> report, citing this email thread.
>>
>>
>> > I feel it has to
>> > make sure that lastchunk has received before caching the data.
>>
>> That is impossible in general (the response may be too big to buffer)
>> but is also unnecessary in most cases (because Squid can stop caching
>> and delete the being-cached object in-flight). My paragraph quoted above
>> has the blueprint for a possible fix.
>>
>> Thanks for your inputs..
> I just want to hear from squid official forum/owner whether it has fixed
> in any recent squid releases so that we can upgrade/patch the fix.
>
>

> - Cross
>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/attachments/20170706/5f09f8de/attachment-0001.html>