[squid-users] How large cacheable object with Rock store now?

[Yuri Voinov]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
 
Ok.

What's the recommended limit? 2 Gb? 4 Gb? 8 Gb? How much?

I want to say: If I want to cache Windows Updates, for example, with 1-2
Tb RAID as storage? Will be good to use Rock? To avoid fs fragmentation,
and maintenance overhead?

08.01.16 22:16, Alex Rousskov пишет:
> On 01/07/2016 03:12 PM, Yuri Voinov wrote:
>
>> How large cacheable object with Rock store now?
>
> I do not recall any artificial or unusual size limitations for Rock
> objects since Large Rock support was added in v3.5. In other words, if
> you can store it in a ufs-based cache_dir, you should be able to store
> it in a rock cache_dir.
>
> However, regardless of the specific store in use, handling of very large
> objects is not optimized, and there are some known store-specific
> scalability problems. Testing is warranted.
>
> Alex.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
 
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWj+HbAAoJENNXIZxhPexGuesH/jXof/bp/MWMTensnn2fO+wP
ysLnk6xmYB4Ce7OW1B2nfPJ1zyTPi/k+7BCFH/F3qsqPlvMqIQv9O0giEoWTlD3O
i8F8xsz59IGJhC05765jl5sVLwsIk6qiiYgyPP2c139taFQ2x/Ft1Sk2uGApbxRf
jNb7p4DJENYzeyMOpUC2MkcJb0bkbvpWG9PrZvikwQwI7PkvnOsPfGUOoYpkaqHX
FeZlxMN8euvrBjxq41wwquHgIBvNtGYQCR9z4v3EQU8jkR1wn3pfvALYCHV4XN8F
6ouzJgSkcgqFH/TaR/3xA3Lxa2SxLvIqMajhUQnjjpZ9KEGgpdcHLwBEMBYSmt0=
=Rft6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----