[squid-users] stoping after rotate

[Marcus Kool]

On 09/08/2015 09:23 PM, Jorgeley Junior wrote:
> ok, read that already, i set cache_mem to 5GB, so is not ok?

No. Squid will use more than 6 GB with cache_mem set to 5 GB.
I suggest that you use 2500 MB and after Squid runs for 1 hour, see what the total process size is.

Marcus


> 2015-09-08 20:25 GMT-03:00 Marcus Kool <marcus.kool at urlfilterdb.com <mailto:marcus.kool at urlfilterdb.com>>:
>
>
>
>     On 09/08/2015 10:39 AM, Jorgeley Junior wrote:
>
>         I have 8GB physical memory and my swap is 32GB.
>         I didn't increase the swap yet, should I?
>
>
>     You must start with reading the memory FAQ: http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/SquidMemory
>
>     The general rule for all processes applies: make sure that a process is *not* larger than 80% of the physical memory.
>     In your case, you must reduce cache_mem and make sure that Squid does not use more than 6 GB.
>
>     A swap of 32 GB is fine for a system with 8 GB physical memory.
>
>     I also suggest to consider a memory upgrade.
>
>     Marcus
>
>
>         2015-09-08 9:23 GMT-03:00 Marcus Kool <marcus.kool at urlfilterdb.com <mailto:marcus.kool at urlfilterdb.com> <mailto:marcus.kool at urlfilterdb.com <mailto:marcus.kool at urlfilterdb.com>>>:
>
>
>
>              On 09/08/2015 08:11 AM, Jorgeley Junior wrote:
>
>                  Thank you all, this is the output:
>                  vm.overcommit_memory = 0
>                  vm.swappiness = 60
>                  I have a Redhat 6.6
>
>
>              The value of vm.overcommit_memory is OK.
>              The default value for vm.swappiness is way too high. It means that Linux swaps out parts of processes when they are idle for a while.
>              For better overall system performance, you want those processes in memory as long as possible and not swapped out so I recommend to change it to 15.
>              This implies that the OS has 15% of the physical memory available for file system buffers which is plenty.
>
>              You only mentioned that the swap is 32 GB.  What is the size of the physical memory ?
>
>              Did you already increase the swap ?
>
>              Marcus
>
>
>                  2015-09-05 15:08 GMT-03:00 Marcus Kool <marcus.kool at urlfilterdb.com <mailto:marcus.kool at urlfilterdb.com> <mailto:marcus.kool at urlfilterdb.com <mailto:marcus.kool at urlfilterdb.com>>
>         <mailto:marcus.kool at urlfilterdb.com <mailto:marcus.kool at urlfilterdb.com> <mailto:marcus.kool at urlfilterdb.com <mailto:marcus.kool at urlfilterdb.com>>>>:
>
>                       On Linux, an important sysctl parameter that determines how Linux behaves with respect to VM allocation is vm.overcommit_memory (should be 0).
>                       And vm.swappiness is important to tune servers (should be 10-15).
>
>                       Which version of Linux do you have and what is the output of
>                           sysctl -a | grep -e vm.overcommit_memory -e  vm.swappiness
>
>                       Marcus
>
>
>                       On 09/04/2015 07:04 PM, Jorgeley Junior wrote:
>
>                           Thanks Amos, i will increase the swap
>
>                           Em 04/09/2015 17:22, "Amos Jeffries" <squid3 at treenet.co.nz <mailto:squid3 at treenet.co.nz> <mailto:squid3 at treenet.co.nz <mailto:squid3 at treenet.co.nz>>
>         <mailto:squid3 at treenet.co.nz <mailto:squid3 at treenet.co.nz> <mailto:squid3 at treenet.co.nz <mailto:squid3 at treenet.co.nz>>> <mailto:squid3 at treenet.co.nz <mailto:squid3 at treenet.co.nz>
>                  <mailto:squid3 at treenet.co.nz <mailto:squid3 at treenet.co.nz>> <mailto:squid3 at treenet.co.nz <mailto:squid3 at treenet.co.nz> <mailto:squid3 at treenet.co.nz <mailto:squid3 at treenet.co.nz>>>>>
>         escreveu:
>
>                                On 5/09/2015 7:16 a.m., Jorgeley Junior wrote:
>                                 > Thanks Amos, my swap is 32GB, so that's causing the error as you said.
>                                 > Which is the better choice: increase the swap size or reduce the
>                                 > cache_mem???
>                                 >
>
>                                Both probably. 128 GB swap I suspect you will need.
>
>                                Increase the swap so the system lets Squid use more virtual memory.
>
>                                Decrease the cache_mem so that Squid does not actually end up using the
>                                swap for its main worker processes. That is a real killer for performance.
>
>
>                                Amos
>
>
>
>                           _______________________________________________
>                           squid-users mailing list
>         squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org <mailto:squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org> <mailto:squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org <mailto:squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org>>
>         <mailto:squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org <mailto:squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org> <mailto:squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org <mailto:squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org>>>
>         http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
>
>
>
>
>                  --
>                  *_
>                  _*
>                  *_
>                  _*
>
>              _______________________________________________
>              squid-users mailing list
>         squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org <mailto:squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org> <mailto:squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org <mailto:squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org>>
>         http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
>
>
>
>
>         --
>         *_
>         _*
>         *_
>         _*
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     squid-users mailing list
>     squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org <mailto:squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org>
>     http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
>
>
>
>
> --
> *_
> _*
> *_
> _*