[squid-users] Block google pictures

[Marcus Kool]

You can force Google safesearch, even with HTTPS.
Google only needs that you put a CNAME entry in your DNS server for www.google.com.
See https://support.google.com/websearch/answer/186669?hl=en Option 3 for more information.

Marcus


On 11/26/2015 12:27 PM, Funke, Martin wrote:
> Im using squid + squid guard in a primary school and sometimes the primary-school pupil search for penis and things like that :).
>
> That’s why I need a way to stop them doing these things.
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-bounces at lists.squid-cache.org] Im Auftrag von Antony Stone
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. November 2015 13:36
> An: squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org
> Betreff: Re: [squid-users] Block google pictures
>
> On Thursday 26 November 2015 at 13:18:46, Funke, Martin wrote:
>
>> Hello list,
>>
>> is there a way to block the access to the google picture search?
>> https://www.google.de/imghp?hl=de
>
> I'm going to stick my neck out and say "no", because there are just too many ways of achieving the same result (ie: people performing image searches).
>
>
> You can start from a specific image search URL such as above
>
> You can start from a standard Google search and then click on the "images"
> link
>
> Even with a standard search, you get images in the results, and you can then
> follow those directly
>
> Of course it's also compounded by the number of different languages Google can
> be accessed in, and the different URLs that provides.
>
> Finally, why pick on Google?  There are plenty of other search engines which
> will give people images in the results.
>
>
> Just out of interest, why do you want to block an image search if you're happy
> with a text search?  What are you trying to stop people getting at?
>
>
> Antony.
>
> --
> I conclude that there are two ways of constructing a software design: One way
> is to make it so simple that there are _obviously_ no deficiencies, and the
> other way is to make it so complicated that there are no _obvious_
> deficiencies.
>
>   - C A R Hoare
>
>                                                     Please reply to the list;
>                                                           please *don't* CC me.
> _______________________________________________
> squid-users mailing list
> squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org
> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
> _______________________________________________
> squid-users mailing list
> squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org
> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
>