[squid-users] TCP_REFRESH_MODIFIED
joe
chip_pop at hotmail.com
Thu Nov 5 09:54:00 UTC 2015
HI Amos after diging and testing wat i found for you is ....
TCP_REFRESH_MODIFIED/200 && TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS/200 ar connected
i will try to explain how dose that happen hoop that im clear enough for you
to understand
ok lets say the way you guys mod the code for the TCP_REFRESH_MODIFIED wen
the file expierd or squid think its modified it delete it right or force
newer copy so wat happen here squid thing its swap fail sending wrong flag
TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS and it should be TCP_REFRESH_MODIFIED
so dont dig as you say for wrong idea its just in the log or what ever
its just wrong flag that happen wen it suppose to be TCP_REFRESH_MODIFIED
that after i spend 24 hr digging to re produce that error
and pls put back as it was before the USE_HTTP_VIOLATIONS and allow us to
decide if that object we need to have it stay longer in cache
const char *pattern;
regex_t compiled_pattern;
time_t min;
double pct;
time_t max;
RefreshPattern *next;
struct {
bool icase;
bool refresh_ims;
bool store_stale;
#if USE_HTTP_VIOLATIONS
bool override_expire;
bool override_lastmod;
bool reload_into_ims;
bool ignore_reload;
bool ignore_no_store;
bool ignore_must_revalidate;
bool ignore_private;
bool ignore_auth;
#endif missing code that you took of V.4.02 and re mod
TCP_REFRESH_MODIFIED to have control making the object stay as before that
will correct the issu
--
View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/TCP-REFRESH-MODIFIED-tp4674325p4674392.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the squid-users
mailing list