[squid-users] WARNING: 1 swapin MD5 mismatches and BUG 3279: HTTP reply without Date:

[Dan Charlesworth]

Hey Eliezer

I don't actually use SMP. I could be wrong about the aufs thing; I haven't
personally tested—and don't currently plan to test—any other cache types. I
just gleaned that from the comments in the bug reports.

Kind regards
Dan


On 20 March 2015 at 13:45, Eliezer Croitoru <eliezer at ngtech.co.il> wrote:

> Hey Dan and John,
>
> If indeed this bug is only for UFS\AUFS cache_dir then I would try to make
> sure that large-rock will not sustain the same issue.
>
> I have not seen in any of the bug reports anything that would reproduce
> the issue.
> To make sure the issue is understood and can or cannot be reproduced using
> ufs\aufs will give one direction.
> I would try to test large rock in my next testing round with SMP but if
> anyone has some option to test it first I will be glad if it will be done
> to make sure ufs\aufs is the culprit.
>
> Also if indeed it's with aufs\ufs only with SMP then it means that the
> issue is related to the way SMP can make a ufs\aufs cache_dir dirty and
> there for the answer would be pretty simple to the issue in hands.
>
> Eliezer
>
> On 20/03/2015 00:32, Dan Charlesworth wrote:
>
>> Hi John
>>
>> This bug has been affecting me on an off for a while as well. I believe it
>> only affects aufs and, unfortunately, has been around for years.
>>
>> See:http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3279
>> And see:http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3483
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> squid-users mailing list
> squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org
> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/attachments/20150320/7c6087c3/attachment.html>