[squid-users] Recommended Multi-CPU Configuration

[Eliezer Croitoru]

May I ask about the setup?
Is this setup of 20 pxy are running in interceot\transparent mode?

Eliezer

On 18/06/2015 06:28, Michael Pelletier wrote:
> Which one would be good for capacity\load? I have a very, very large
> environment. I have 220,000 users on 8 Gig to the INTERNET. I am running a
> load balancer, ipvsadm (Direct Routing) with 20 proxies behind it. I am
> interested in handling load.
>
> Michael
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 9:31 PM, Amos Jeffries <squid3 at treenet.co.nz> wrote:
>
>> On 18/06/2015 8:53 a.m., Michael Pelletier wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am looking to had some more power to squid. I have seen two different
>>> types of configurations to do this:
>>>
>>> 1. Adding workers directive equal to the number of cpus. Then adding a
>>> special wrapper around the AUFS disk cache so that the correct worker can
>>> only access the correct cache. Yes, I know rock is multi cpu capable.
>>>
>>> 2. Using the split configuration from the Squid Web page. This involved a
>>> front end and multiple backend squid servers on the same server.
>>> http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/MultiCpuSystem
>>>
>>> My question is, which one is recommended? What are the pros and cons of
>>> each?
>>>
>>
>> Both and neither. #1 improves bandwidth savings. #2 improves raw speed.
>> Pick your poison.
>>
>> These are example configurations only. For real high performance mutiple
>> machines in a mix of the two setups is even better.
>>
>> Amos
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> squid-users mailing list
>> squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org
>> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> squid-users mailing list
> squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org
> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
>