[squid-users] AUFS vs. DISKS
FredB
fredbmail at free.fr
Thu Jul 16 19:07:12 UTC 2015
> Fred,
> The AUFS works for us, we switched all our clients back to the AUFS
> from
> DISKD.
> Yes, there are some Queue congestions at the squid restart (during 30
> min
> maxi), but as Amos said the Squid will re-adapt its internal value to
> fit
> the traffic, I can confirm that point.
> After a while, the queue congestion disapears but we see many info
> from the
> cache.log saying objects are not found but here I think we don't
> really care
> as the Squid is smart enough to correct its index file...
>
> We have ISPs with 1-2Gbps bandwidth, no complain anymore, only "Thx
> guys,
> great job !"
>
>
> Amos, all the Squid team,
> You have fixed the issues with the AUFS (isEmpty, ...), so thanks to
> all of
> you because with a previous unstable aufs, a still slow diskd and a
> bugged
> rock, it was not easy to have a stable squid cache with good
> performances.
>
>
Hi,
Interesting , but I was worried about
2015/07/15 13:36:07 kid1| DiskThreadsDiskFile::openDone: (2) No such file or directory
No message like this with 3.5 ?
More information about the squid-users
mailing list