[squid-users] AUFS vs. DISKS

[Yuri Voinov]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
 
I think,

it's enough datacenter class HDD. Also I use it with mirror option for
speed and reliability in my setup. This is comprehensive enough to
enterprise-level proxy. ;)

Of course, I know you know the separation between two hardware clauses.
;) I know it too. ;)

15.07.15 22:20, Eliezer Croitoru пишет:
> On 15/07/2015 16:36, Yuri Voinov wrote:
>> SSD as squid cache?! You are really rich, man!
>
> Please do separate two things Enterprise level SSD and Desktop SSD.
> They are different by nature and they do not tend to "break" easily.
> They do have different life spans and Enterprise grade HDDs tend to be
more reliable in some setups.
>
> Since AUFS and UFS will not work very well with SMP squid I would
consider using only because of that ROCK.
> I am testing and I do not have enough horse power to make sure that
really high load will break rock cache.
>
> If you do have a set of tests to run and give grounds to some
assumptions or to remove specuilations I will be happy to run some.
>
> Eliezer
>
> _______________________________________________
> squid-users mailing list
> squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org
> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
 
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVppGfAAoJENNXIZxhPexGfXQH/3i4p8jDd+z4zprlTW9q98vg
bvLli6IxJlPsdHRgyApTwjCHAru6HqlV/DGBJKn+6k0BgfTjJnjOe63GhlK95yXt
Kn8U06cLhy7YL9osLcbWXRveozMiviSdmgHeWVM3ecBy0o0WAYhL8+NHL9a94b8R
JEUodWDX9p+WhaFhzunSo35MAdx6uNePW31WzrWBlS4uJ2EJfqdlT0fJJOMTlJk+
aWTV9wMLNGypeLcIoSuUGCG9a0qmqHdyYCz+XrDfkVu03A9Y8z4rA8HHsH4z9ioq
p7EStlVaJDgkDVXbxNfwIJk6mjcZ6R/T4R55+AAN1KFdv5B1dQ8LPVGf/aDGBX4=
=ypk/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/attachments/20150715/0f16ce4e/attachment.html>