[squid-users] AUFS vs. DISKS

[FredB]

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>  
> This test means nothing. Only very approximate overall IO performance
> for IO subsystem.
> 

Not nothing I don't agree, it's not sufficiently precise to indicate where the problem is, ok with that, but if you change only diskd by aufs you should not see a - huge - difference like this. It's just an end user experience but this explain the complaints of his users. 

Fred, I think you have made some tests, not just one ?

Here with more load I can't have a poor performance like this, no matter aufs or diskd. So, at least with 3.4.13, diskd can be more faster and you have a problem, it's not just because diskd is more slow.