[squid-users] AUFS vs. DISKS

[Yuri Voinov]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
 
And note this: TCP_HIT generally flows with other network traffic. We
don't know, how it handles during peak hours in network equipment, right?

To be sure, we must prioritizing TCP_HITS on network level, well?

15.07.15 19:58, FredB пишет:
>
>
>> Objet: Re: [squid-users] AUFS vs. DISKS
>>
>> Hi Fred,
>> tests from my side:
>> DISKD with TCP_HIT objects: 564KB/s with wget, the same url you have
>> tested.
>> AUFS with TCP_HITS objects: 47.8M/s, same wget, same squid, same url,
>> same
>> all.
>>
>> Wget with AUFS:
>> Length: 10095849 (9.6M) [application/x-msdos-program]
>> Saving to: `youtube_downloader_hd_setup-2.9.9.23.exe'
>> 100%[======================================>] 10,095,849  47.9M/s
>>   in 0.2s
>> 2015-07-15 15:48:29 (47.9 MB/s) -
>> `youtube_downloader_hd_setup-2.9.9.23.exe'
>> saved
>>
>> All,
>> We have switched some ISPs from DISKD to AUFS this morning, the
>> "queue
>> congestion" appears at the begining then disappears from the
>> cache.log. For
>> how long, nobody knows...
>>
>
>
> Very very, strange, can you make a test with squid 3.4.13 ?
> _______________________________________________
> squid-users mailing list
> squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org
> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
 
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVpmiGAAoJENNXIZxhPexGrgoIAK2pGtHW8TxyHiOA3epdev1z
x1jZZCkXykxIVofXlKnqJJ3rOTery1PtItlKICEyqVldtCQ9kzpBt8bO+RSJiV5e
Wi3MxzzOLi3ZF1hKlPspdCBfGuag79B60eirwucr6Fhh4keQ+2armglauSh9Liqt
6OlzIpmCiqfmqPDFUNKJZdFq8qMuAIUwVfxO602U/wBajpAB09oVNWdeMWakeeFc
X1XlDe4XZklXY4dGNfTjjBrnPZy4azU97tI+GUpgCAKPg8q2R6DcDvbkMoiP1j3p
ySmHAe0BcixTOqbg5aAQGog4ypHyTVktCcTxC6RTEopBE7NDvGvaND0yD33nOGQ=
=dZU8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----