[squid-users] AUFS vs. DISKS

[Yuri Voinov]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
 
I think, that using datacenter (not consumer) class HDD is more
preferrable than SSD.

Cache content lost means cached traffic and money loss. And this is not
acceptable for big caches.

15.07.15 19:57, FredB пишет:
>
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA256
>> 
>> It depends from your squid settings (memory cache size, etc), your OS
>> (as expected), your fs.
>>
>> My installation works 4 years 24x7 with shipped HDD.
>>
>
> Yes, in my case it depends of number of read/write by second, I know
that I often reached some life time expectancy for a hard disk drive,
but I mean, I heard (but maybe I'm wrong) that SSD still easily
breakable and with short life time, at least more short, this is not
dangerous for a cache ? 
> _______________________________________________
> squid-users mailing list
> squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org
> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
 
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVpmdqAAoJENNXIZxhPexGHE0IAKPo73Tpd7LlIbcFXe0FceK4
6u/waFkb2Vtg2CbkEbI54l4w392kDNVEYcoy9CA0/i+6w8YnG/4lMDWNiueDzWUy
XS+lJW5LWcS/yLWAfRFJYNZPICzR8KqFDfQ6EG3QcAvVcnhRAkmv0Trq7gNx5n9T
HH9CTGzMLqXKaUhbALKeJl7JaP6VJPxaC8Zi1KXoE43XB3/XvmZx2OL+Y4t6nQq8
vuNZ0jRM+007hY1H7FDHbegbbFYQtI+DB7LfeKACVAmdFC4fAoq0EmH/ZQBpO15G
Dbf/c1ipeTI/gn04LY1m7XTrcOUZEA3vxwe+dBccvi+fU7SuBEN0bwALHZqPP6U=
=jgIC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----