[squid-users] AUFS vs. DISKS

[Yuri Voinov]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
 
Speaking in essence: Performance depends strongly on the process model
used by the operating system, from settings, the hardware configuration
and the actual configuration of the operating system. And it can not be
considered in isolation from all these factors.

Tuning performance of a complex problem, and foolish to expect its
decision in a particular case configuration, which is chosen at random,
without understanding the process.

Different operating systems have different process models based on
different hardware and behave differently. Proxies can not depend on
these factors.

15.07.15 19:33, Eliezer Croitoru пишет:
> Just adding something to the subject.
> HDD vs SSD speeds are quite something.
> I have tried to test the benefits of a SSD in the past and in many
cases it was a great addition of speed.
>
> Eliezer
>
> On 15/07/2015 15:27, Stakres wrote:
>> Amos,
>>
>> We're using the latest 3.5.6 build, and we have not yet planed new tests
>> with the Rock. We were a bit disapointed with so we're not really
"hot" to
>> spend time in testing it.
>>
>> We're ok with the Diskd mode, except with the TCP_HIT objects (50+ times
>> slower).
>> We did tests on a basic server, i3 with 4GB memory, the disk is a
2.5' 80GB
>> not a rocket but good to figure out bad/good speed;)
>>
>> Fred
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> squid-users mailing list
> squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org
> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
 
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVpmNQAAoJENNXIZxhPexG9o4IAL/aU4VNzxpmwhLZtpaX0Rm+
uhaH+9Z/0CenJ9HRMWiAijK0MWaGMYSEJaQtYm/RUDI3Tre6Ntc4IGjtIrPOsHyA
kQmPJUBGebr9g//dX/MtQYQZ9sXprAuDfPfs6K48BXsBEgmPnKbpw4MrTMv5Hp1E
/v9UqQXLxU2kTway5p+7ir3HuE4l8BfLIsE5E4KCnRtafvXUFndu0X+9MI9neAHz
/7R/xhMuJaAMw5q5MLHWEJxFAkejm03C3l4E4ssdu5q/8b4Uwc2razz+mDNoRA+b
AZQGgiYSyX6C2atkBP9IBEt4wD5Vy8OFT9rM3ra2Ac9DbMNo1azWl2bNsTIpDfY=
=vGY/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----