[squid-users] AUFS vs. DISKS

[Yuri Voinov]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
 
AFAIK,

diskd speed depends from backend fs (OS level).

I use diskd over zfs with some tunables and has acceptable response
time, approx 0.1 sec.

15.07.15 18:52, Stakres пишет:
> Fred,
> (Guys, 2 french Fred here, but not the sames)
>
> Did you check the TCP_HIT response times with the Diskd ?
> During our tests, we have seen than it's sometime better to download the
> object from internet again instead using the one from the cache, we got
> better response times...
>
> Fred
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/AUFS-vs-DISKS-tp4672209p4672235.html
> Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> squid-users mailing list
> squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org
> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
 
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVplnsAAoJENNXIZxhPexG0tUH/1h9VlUagDHBKezcgJRNzozn
U4Y4HUL8PHJa3Dma0kNlFtvU+LZENNbv941JHF/8kiSHBEFcd/ZPMu3YqJxtXj4H
hAgPxGcKGbYEfUzHHSYaPuWt08Xe9by0f+JguAHesBELMnSZIP+PJFjlsG6Ag8gy
qhvC31YrqZONeka3Ozgq0oQdHbSlZhKHaRqf2ZxqtFxqYacsbOMeLQrwAYNU8nRL
CbwkYwIP7poCq5qZg+uKDF1ngHOB/7uzV1nbYMfGVhmmOwAEWi5cQRNACCTJ0WNc
5iywDpEkRU4oi0LaKLUBBSf6mN9VB974u3P2lY+Io9GXNb3/Cw+kycKDoqGM4ao=
=INBP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----