[squid-users] TProxy and client_dst_passthru

Amos Jeffries squid3 at treenet.co.nz
Fri Jul 3 12:59:22 UTC 2015


On 4/07/2015 12:05 a.m., Stakres wrote:
> Hi Amos,
> Can we expect a workaround to allow the object to the cache if the dns
> record is corrected by Squid instead that having an ORIGINAL_DST ?
> If Squid corrects the request, it mean the URL will be good, so we should be
> able to cache the object 

Any ideas on how Squid could "correct" the request when all data comes
from the untrusted client?

I am still looking for ways to get per-client caching to operate
cleanly. For these (and Cache-Control:private objects) to be stored for
re-use by the one client.

Amos



More information about the squid-users mailing list