[squid-users] squid version 3.5.5
Paul Martin
paul.martin.b787 at gmail.com
Thu Jul 2 05:55:38 UTC 2015
Hello
Thanks and just another question about internet bandwith
I notice
> -squid version 3.3.8: I have 40k squid cache objects
> -squid version 3.5.5: I have 2k squid cache objects
Does it mean I need x10 to x20 times more "internet bandwith network" with
squid 3.5.5 compare to 3.3.8 ?
Because if I upgrade squid to version 3.5.5, I should also need to upgrade
my network capacity, what do you think ?
Thank you
Paul
2015-07-01 14:15 GMT+02:00 Amos Jeffries <squid3 at treenet.co.nz>:
> On 1/07/2015 11:49 p.m., Paul Martin wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am using 2 machines with 2 squids versions,same squid.conf and both
> with
> > 700 Http requests/sec.
> >
> > -squid version 3.3.8: I have 40k squid cache objects
> >
> > -squid version 3.5.5: I have 2k squid cache objects
> >
> > Do you have an idea why squid cache objects is so different with squid
> > version 3.5.5 compare with 3.3.8 ?
>
> Insufficient data. (sorry bad pun, but its true).
>
> Unless the two proxies are receiving exacty the same data at the same
> time for the whole of their uptime its unlikely they will have the same
> content cached.
>
> A lot of change has also happened over the 2 years between those versions.
>
> At the very least "Bug 3806: Caching responses with Vary header" will
> cause many fewer cache entries since Vary objects are no longer added to
> cache then index entries 'lost'.
>
> Also, various fixes in CONNECT handling allow some modern non-HTTP
> protocols to work better over proxy CONNECT tunnels. That could be
> allowing more of teh traffic through the 3.5 proxy to be using those
> protocols instead of HTTP the proxy can cache.
>
> There have also been several revalidation and Range handling fixes that
> may reduce the number of objects needed in cache.
>
> Amos
>
> _______________________________________________
> squid-users mailing list
> squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org
> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/attachments/20150702/285efe88/attachment.html>
More information about the squid-users
mailing list