[squid-users] if i use squid 3.5.2 , which part is stable between coss and rock for operating small http object .

[johnzeng]

Hi Amos Jeffries:

                            Thanks again .

                           because squid 2.7 stable 9 can support coss 
for small http object , if i use  squid 3.5.2 ,

                            which part is stable between coss and rock 
for operating small http object ?


                            Whether squid 3.5.2 can support wccp ?


                             Best Regards

                              John



于 2015年02月28日 11:42, Amos Jeffries 写道:
> On 28/02/2015 4:18 p.m., johnzeng wrote:
>> Hi all :
>>
>>
>>
>> i meet a problem ,Squid cannot currently deal with such connections (
>> non-HTTP connections ) based 80 port , and We get some error ,
>>
>> Unsupported Request Method and Protocol'' for https URLs..
> NOTE: HTTPS never goes over port 80.
>
> HTTPS native port is 443, and when proxied uses the proxy port.
>
> Intercepted HTTPS traffic MUST NOT be delivered to a http_port listening
> port in Squid. Use https_port instead.
>
>> i search via www.ask.com , but i don't good way .
>>
>> if possible ,i hope to use squid 2.7 stable9 , Maybe it will be stable version untile now .
>>
>> Whether we can resolve the problem via other tunnel tools + squid 2.7 ( for example:
>> http://www.nocrew.org/software/httptunnel.html ) or
>> http://desproxy.sourceforge.net <http://desproxy.sourceforge.net/>????
>
> Current stable version is 3.5.2. Please use that.
>
> Particularly if you are intercepting HTTPS traffic. There is an arms
> race going on between people trying to use HTTPS for security and people
> trying to filter it. Things are changing rapidly.
>
> Amos
>
> _______________________________________________
> squid-users mailing list
> squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org
> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users