[squid-users] Should `squid -k check` complain about presence of `ignore-no-cache` in 3.4.11

[Karl-Philipp Richter]

Hi,
According to
http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/2015-February/002323.html
the `ignore-no-cache` option is outdated. Shouldn't `squid -k check`
warn about its presence (I verified that the check works by adding `bla`
at the end of the config file with causes a warning `unrecognized:
'bla'`)? Currently the validation passes in 3.4.11 (on FreeBSD 9.3).

In case it should, is that a bug or a feature request?

Best regards,
Kalle

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 484 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/attachments/20150222/3a61274c/attachment.sig>