[squid-users] light weight ICAP server that isn't dead :o)

[Luis Miguel Silva]

I've already installed it and took a look at it but I didn't want to waste
time evaluating "5 different solutions" so I asked you guys to learn what
was, statistically, the most popular choice :o).

How about the performance of i-icap with e-cap on top of it?
Its my understanding that squid can hook directly into e-cap (which would
eliminate the i-cap layer [in case I want to use e-cap]). On the other
hand, I would have to compile squid with e-cap support (which I would
rather not have to do)...

Thoughts?

Thanks,
Luis

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Christos Tsantilas <christos at chtsanti.net>
wrote:

> On 02/10/2015 01:00 AM, Luis Miguel Silva wrote:
>
>>
>> The most interesting one seems to be C-ICAP but I don't like that it
>> hasn't even reached a 1.0 version...
>>
>
> If you believe that it is interesting then at least test it to see if it
> matches your needs.
>
> The version number has to do with its goals and number of implemented
> features and not with its stability.
>
> Regards,
>    Christos
>
>
>> What do you guys recommend I adopt?
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Luis Silva
>>
> _______________________________________________
> squid-users mailing list
> squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org
> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/attachments/20150210/442e201d/attachment.html>