[squid-users] benefits of using ext_kerberos_ldap_group_aclinstead of ext_ldap_group_acl
Simon Stäheli
sis at open.ch
Tue Feb 10 16:33:30 UTC 2015
>>>> "Amos Jeffries" wrote in message news:54BE3B5C.8040800 at
>>>> treenet.co.nz...
>>>>
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>
>>>> On 20/01/2015 11:31 p.m., Simon Stäheli wrote:
>>>>> Are there any other benefits in using ext_kerberos_ldap_group_acl
>>>>> instead of ext_ldap_group_acl except the "Netbios name to Kerberos
>>>>> domain name” mappings provided by the -N option. As far as I can
>>>>> tell, this mapping can also easily be done by writing you own
>>>>> helper perl script which is doing the mapping and finally feeds the
>>>>> more common ext_ldap_group_acl helper.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Whatever floats your boat. The point of the Addon/Plugin/helpers API
>>>> is that you can use scripts if thy serve your needs better.
>>>>
>>>> All the usual Open Source benefits of "many eyeballs" and somebody
>>>> else doing code maintenance for you applies to using a bundled helper
>>>> over a custom written one.
>>>>
>>>> Beyond that the kerberos helper also provides automatic detection of
>>>> which LDAP server to use via mutiple auto-configuration methods.
>>>>
>>>
>>> The idea of the helper was to automate most of the configuration (
>>> ignoring
>>> some performance ) and avoid using a username/password, support users
>>> from
>>> multiple domains. Secondly I wanted check for nested groups which was
>>> not
>>> available in the existing helper and thirdly I also check now against
>>> the
>>> primary group of the user.
>>>
>>
>> Thank you Markus for your explanations. I played around with
>> ext_kerberos_ldap_group_acl and would like to go into some details:
>>
>> 1) it is possible to define more than one LDAP server (e.g. for high
>> availability reasons)? The -l parameter allows only one ldap url while
>> -S allows several "server > realm" - mappings.
>>
>
> I didn't see the need. The -l was more for cases when digest or basic auth
> is used and I do not know the domain to check against. So a fallback
> option.
>
>
>> 2) It is correct, that compared to ext_ldap_group_acl,
>> ext_kerberos_ldap_group_acl does not require a groupname as input (from
>> stdin), because -g -t -T or -D control the group name?!
>>
>
> You have two options with ext_kerberos_ldap_group_acl as input or as -g ..
> control
>
>
>> 3) What is the use case for defining -g GROUP@? What is the difference
>> to -g GROUP (without @)
>>
>
> -g GROUP is for all users including the once with nor provided domain
>
>
> The an pages describe it a bit under Note:
>
> 1) For user at REALM
> a) Query DNS for SRV record _ldap._tcp.REALM
> b) Query DNS for A record REALM
> c) Use LDAP_URL if given
>
> 2) For user
> a) Use domain -D REALM and follow step 1)
> b) Use LDAP_URL if given
>
> The Groups to check against are determined as follows:
>
> 1) For user at REALM
> a) Use values given by -g option which contain a @REALM e.g. -g
> GROUP1 at REALM:GROUP2 at REALM
> b) Use values given by -g option which contain a @ only e.g. -g
> GROUP1@:GROUP2@
> c) Use values given by -g option which do not contain a realm e.g.
> -g GROUP1:GROUP2
>
> 2) For user
> a) Use values given by -g option which do not contain a realm e.g.
> -g GROUP1:GROUP2
>
> 3) For NDOMAIN\user
> a) Use realm given by -N NDOMAIN at REALM and then use values given by
> -g option which contain a @REALM e.g. -g GROUP1 at REALM:GROUP2 at REALM
>
>
>
>> 4) The "query DNS for SRV record _ldap._tcp.REALM" mechanism seems no to
>> work for me although the DNS server is configured correctly and querying
>> with "dig SRV _ldap._tcp.REALM" works fine. Anything to consider here?
>> _ldap._tcp.REALM SRV query was never sent so far.
>>
>
> I would not see an obvious reason. Does -d show any hints ? I can only
> imagine that REAM is not what is send by the client.
>
>> 5) Similar issues with the Kerberos feature. Keytab und Kerberos config
>> are available and exported, but the helper only says:
>> support_ldap.cc(888): DEBUG: Setup Kerberos credential cache
>> support_ldap.cc(897): DEBUG: Kerberos is not supported. Use
>> username/password with ldap url instead
>>
>
> The message support_ldap.cc(897): DEBUG: Kerberos is not supported. means
> your Kerberos installation is not fully available. It means HAVE_KRB5 is not
> set ( maybe header files were missing).
Can you give me some further information about the requirements of the helper regarding kerberos? I am trying to use it with Heimdal kerberos (Heimdal 1.3.3). negotiate_kerberos_auth for example works very well with the present kerberos libraries.
>
>> Instead of that I found a dns SRV _kerberos._udp.REALM query which was
>> actually answered by the dns. I assume this is related to the Kerberos
>> feature?
>
> yes it is. It is a way to find the kdc.
>
>>
>> 6) It is possible to use the helper when DNS service is not reachable?
>> Got some error messages during testing:
>>
>> kerberos_ldap_group: DEBUG: Canonicalise ldap server name
>> 213.156.236.111:3268
>> kerberos_ldap_group: ERROR: Error while resolving ip address with
>> getnameinfo: Temporary failure in name resolution
>> kerberos_ldap_group: DEBUG: Error during initialisation of ldap
>> connection: Success
>>
>
> If you add a line to your hosts file and use the approriate nsswitch.conf it
> should work. You can also add a line to the hosts file for the domain for
> the case the SRV record fails.
>
>
>> Beside this tiny issues the helper works excellent (tested with basic,
>> NTLM and Kerberos authentication). I am just trying to discover the
>> whole potential. Thank you very much for any responses.
>>
>> Regards
>> Simon
>>
>
> Regards
> Markus
>
>>>> If you can demonstrate that the ext_kerberos_ldap_group_acl does
>>>> provides a superset of the functionality of ext_ldap_group_acl helper
>>>> then I can de-duplicate the two helpers.
>>>>
>>>> Amos
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Markus
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4030 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/attachments/20150210/f5f16b0f/attachment.bin>
More information about the squid-users
mailing list