[squid-users] squid 3.5.3: squid -z => FATAL: memory_cache_shared is on, but no support for atomic operations detected

[Paul Martin]

Hi Dan,

problem is the same following Michael' idea.
I tried ./configure
with  CXXFLAGS=-std=c++11 => got many warning
with  CXXFLAGS=-std=c++0x => got many warning
with  CXXFLAGS=-matomic-model=strict => got many warning (example:
strings.h present but cannot be compiled)

Any solution ?

Thank you
Paul



2015-04-28 13:11 GMT+02:00 <dan at getbusi.com>:

> Hi Paul
>
> See Michael’s reply to my thread about the same problem, not long ago:
>
> http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Re-assertion-failed-src-ipc-AtomicWord-h-88-Enabled-tp4670597p4670793.html
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 8:50 PM, Paul Martin <paul.martin.b787 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>  Hello,
>>
>> I am testing squid 3.5.3 using not the sample squid.conf (this works) but
>> a  squid.conf containing:
>> "cache_dir rock ..."
>> "memory_cache_shared on"
>>
>> I got problems:
>> --
>> problem 1: squid.conf with memory_cache_shared on
>> #./squid -z
>> result:
>> FATAL: memory_cache_shared is on, but no support for atomic operations
>> detected
>> ---
>> problem 2: squid.conf with memory_cache_shared off
>> #./squid -z
>> 2015/04/28 10:28:46| assrtion failed: ../../src/ipc/AtomicWord.h: 88:
>> "Enabled()"
>> --
>>
>> How can I solve problem 1 (I want to keep  "cache_dir rock ..." and
>> "memory_cache_shared on") ?
>> (many versions (squid 3.5.3r13abc) tested and same problems)
>>
>> Why problem 2 ?
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Paul
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> squid-users mailing list
> squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org
> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/attachments/20150428/1ace49a3/attachment.html>