[squid-users] Possible-Spam a question about Dns lookup

[Yuri Voinov]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
 
Yep,

especially with Unbound :)

07.04.15 2:29, Lawrence Pingree пишет:
>
> Unless you are doing authoritative DNS lookups, you may only want to
use a caching forwarder like dnsmasq. Also, squid's ipcache_size
parameter can be tweaked to cache more dns responses. Disabling internal
DNS would actually hinder performance in most cases.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-bounces at lists.squid-cache.org]
On Behalf Of johnzeng
> Sent: Saturday, April 4, 2015 8:27 AM
> To: squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org; Amos Jeffries
> Subject: Possible-Spam [squid-users] a question about Dns lookup
>
>
> Hello All
>
> I deploy squid 3.5.2 and Bind9 at same box , and redirect full dns
request to Bind server via setting /etc/resolv.conf nameserver 127.0.0.1
>
> and i use tproxy and bridge mode , but when traffic thourgh squid ,
and i found dns resolving rate will be slow than privious status .
>
> Whether i need configure --/disable/-internal-/dns/ or other ??
>
>
> if possible , please give me some advisement .
>
>
> Best Regards
>
> john
> _______________________________________________
> squid-users mailing list
> squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org
> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> squid-users mailing list
> squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org
> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
 
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVIu1OAAoJENNXIZxhPexGs4cH+wRs5V1Fo4q/U44X/8eOdqRm
s26VQ6ewdEZv06G988pvXYzpwo/XcrMlS10LsGrsS4LfFb9lpVfQjGMxslCQYeoZ
1JTDxEEx/mAfgQ4DnGVqMqS1UAyPjvkvCo4vcsYNClHe/+dkx7GE9eWPhGlVZIo9
vXXADq6oK6a5dnGMmPGSX5GdDATRoxDJIZDHT0nRr07YIislBbbqVhYwIofN9fS2
uQ4IZPc25cdB26lhcICWTqzcgaCVfZLas2PjblJBUnCsTD1aG0ecfU5pQCYNIAEN
3PCtL/+g5bNts/pQqrnhdn2aeioOyWPMrhUDO1I5zm6KPZegN+COq3D7vRuNfwo=
=dvBL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----