[squid-users] Squid, Kerberos and FireFox (Was: Re: leaking memory in squid 3.4.8 and 3.4.7.)
Victor Sudakov
sudakov at sibptus.tomsk.ru
Thu Oct 23 11:41:16 UTC 2014
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Amos Jeffries wrote:
> >>>>> And about the basic issues that you were having with
> >>>>> performance, does it help to run Kerberos instead of NTLM
> >>>>> (it should...)?
> >>>>
> >>>> I have even moved squid to a new virtual machine (FreeBSD
> >>>> 9.3-RELEASE under VMWare, 1 GB RAM) and performance still
> >>>> sucks royally.
> >
> > I don't know what's happening with squid but this kind of CPU
> > consumption is just not normal:
>
> Well, it both is and it isn't.
>
> Squid *will* use the CPU hardware right up too the 100% limit if it
> has any need to that is normal.
>
> Needing to for long periods of time is not particularly normal ...
> except under conditions where the traffic load is too high for the
> server hardware to cope with.
>
> I did see a scenario with behaviour exactly like this at a client some
> time back. After detailed analysis it turned out that their NTLM
> helper had been so slow that clients traffic spent more time waiting
> for next auth action than processing requests.
Looks like my scenario but I am already using a Kerberos helper.
I'll increase the number of virtual CPUs tonight. The OS kernel should
parallel the authentication children for 2 CPUs, maybe that will make
a difference.
> But when they moved to the higher performance Kerberos and a simpler
> proxy configuration the client traffic throughput increased to a
> req/sec rate faster than the server could cope (3x previous rate).
> It thus was bottlenecked by 100% CPU speed limit rather than by NTLM
> delays.
>
> So, "normal" depends on what exactly is the cause of the behaviour.
>
> What req/sec traffic rates are you seeing on what you consider a
> "normal" / older proxy compared to this one?
The number of clients and queries is exactly the same as with the
older proxy. Nothing has changed other than squid version. Besides,
the older proxy was using the LM auth helper.
>
> Also, what are the heleprs stats looking like in the cachemgr report?
Here it is:
Sending HTTP request ... done.
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Server: squid/3.4.8
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 11:37:16 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain
Expires: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 11:37:16 GMT
Last-Modified: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 11:37:16 GMT
X-Cache: MISS from proxy.sibptus.transneft.ru
X-Cache-Lookup: MISS from proxy.sibptus.transneft.ru:3128
Via: 1.1 proxy.sibptus.transneft.ru (squid/3.4.8)
Connection: close
Negotiate Authenticator Statistics:
program: /usr/local/libexec/squid/negotiate_kerberos_auth
number active: 25 of 100 (0 shutting down)
requests sent: 51956
replies received: 51956
queue length: 0
avg service time: 1 msec
ID # FD PID # Requests # Replies Flags Time Offset Request
0 9 9803 32120 32120 0.001 0 (none)
0 11 9804 9412 9412 0.011 0 (none)
0 13 9805 4477 4477 0.011 0 (none)
0 15 9806 2338 2338 0.011 0 (none)
0 17 9807 1320 1320 0.009 0 (none)
0 380 9809 789 789 0.009 0 (none)
0 393 9810 521 521 0.011 0 (none)
0 396 9811 332 332 0.025 0 (none)
0 398 9812 221 221 0.025 0 (none)
0 400 9813 144 144 0.025 0 (none)
0 402 9814 100 100 0.024 0 (none)
0 404 9815 58 58 1.211 0 (none)
0 406 9816 38 38 1.211 0 (none)
0 408 9817 29 29 1.211 0 (none)
0 410 9818 20 20 1.211 0 (none)
0 577 9902 13 13 1.211 0 (none)
0 587 9903 8 8 1.211 0 (none)
0 651 9904 5 5 1.211 0 (none)
0 668 9905 4 4 1.211 0 (none)
0 673 9906 3 3 1.211 0 (none)
0 677 9907 2 2 3.669 0 (none)
0 679 9908 1 1 3.669 0 (none)
0 681 9909 1 1 3.669 0 (none)
0 684 9910 0 0 0.000 0 (none)
0 688 9911 0 0 0.000 0 (none)
Flags key:
B = BUSY
C = CLOSING
R = RESERVED
S = SHUTDOWN PENDING
P = PLACEHOLDER
- --
Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN
sip:sudakov at sibptus.tomsk.ru
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUSOlbAAoJEA2k8lmbXsY0r7AIAJhEAcUYajdnLa+geOlMblaG
8w+EyzWX6H+Sg1qaevBi28rB16qo0aAez4SY+GvTtle3qUnGdU3xpMxOKz+F4LV9
8Rz47bV4XfTyB8o4YF7ukFE9u/1CGQP+wk9FKGWZwpANiaE633PyMnEG0ftJYo1i
dK96bCBMhNjArbwqKGgR1SQgO7KfJhVYspLs8700d/sgV2d8xx7FXoxICLhyG6Xz
N+yUETFn6el6CUFnM+YGKBXylfzp56KQg92pP/TNYZ9cj7vH4vKDsexmq3VrACTn
FsF7cz3vQWMaBrsTSLExFzcSm2Gri5WewjeMR9HBzxNBCw24VvbSn0CL7e5sbRw=
=0Hh1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the squid-users
mailing list