[squid-users] Squid not using all cache_mem/ Increase TCP_MEM_HIT squid 2.6
andrew williams
dw.andrew at gmail.com
Thu Nov 13 06:16:20 UTC 2014
Thank you Amos.
maximum_object_size_in_memory must be the special setting that I had
missed. Memory hits now up to 60%
Cache information for squid:
Request Hit Ratios: 5min: 84.4%, 60min: 78.6%
Byte Hit Ratios: 5min: 80.6%, 60min: 67.9%
Request Memory Hit Ratios: 5min: 63.1%, 60min: 66.1%
Request Disk Hit Ratios: 5min: 8.7%, 60min: 10.2%
Storage Swap size: 13823916 KB
Storage Mem size: 488276 KB
Mean Object Size: 61.36 KB
Requests given to unlinkd: 0
And yes I'm very keen to get to squid 3.. hopefully soon!
thanks!
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Amos Jeffries <squid3 at treenet.co.nz>
wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 13/11/2014 2:07 p.m., andrew williams wrote:
> > Hi, I'm getting what I think is too low of MEM_HIT ratio.. I would
> > like squid to use all of the cache_mem, thus increasing MEM_HIT?
>
> You are running a 32-bit build of a Squid version deprecated more than
> 6 years ago.
>
> Please upgrade to a current release. Today that would be 3.4.9
> (stable) or 3.5.0.2 (beta).
>
>
> <snip>
> >
> > Why is squid not using all 4096 MB allocated? it's only using
> > 590MB according to mgr:info. Is there something extra I need to do?
> > To me the HIT rate is reasonable... they hit's are just not coming
> > from memory
>
> Your average object size is almost 64KB yet squid-2.6 only stores up
> to 8 KB objects in memory by default.
> <
> http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v2/2.6/cfgman/maximum_object_size_in_memory.html
> >
>
> One of the many benefits of upgrading is that the defaults are
> occasionally updated to reflect modern web reality. Todays Squid store
> objects up to 512KB by default in a default 256MB cache_mem.
>
> PS. Todays Squid also properly store and manage objects with
> Cache-Control:no-cache.
>
> Amos
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUZBiSAAoJELJo5wb/XPRjAmAH/R2XqFbj0FHTcTS1Bxix9BvW
> 5+BOY0s8Iyo54xcQnaZZn8AxFbNC/ksYN1Eh3yulTbMj17Y5IK9zS09eMkv0DXG+
> 0sTmzvw2Dj88lWQw/wrwEM8eEq4rkAVWYaE+puD+rOBGNMU9MkcJ4/auYjcUAJuY
> ENFZ+4CzLQLZnzKRlVjxNb9FVyC6qMbvKi7pui/t9DItBGhT+KmTXC8W3G3JUG9T
> riQT5Ma9ccYEyDQv2mfK4tDhTRGPXtaO3e5XWtZ777z9yDih9K7MAXx2wn+Q2Xn0
> rbxkU+BD9h0i25I31FLG7eWekMJ7ZOBXLie37P2IbA5FERW3evrh0j/Z4tfXCSQ=
> =g0N5
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> squid-users mailing list
> squid-users at lists.squid-cache.org
> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/attachments/20141113/c7dedb6f/attachment.html>
More information about the squid-users
mailing list