[squid-dev] Bzr to git migration schedule

Kinkie gkinkie at gmail.com
Fri Jul 21 11:04:21 UTC 2017


I'll try to look into it over the weekend.

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 7:30 AM, Eliezer Croitoru <eliezer at ngtech.co.il> wrote:
> NOC NOC, anybody there?
>
> Please take a minute to look at the subject.
>
> Thanks,
> Eilezer
> ----
> Eliezer Croitoru
> Linux System Administrator
> Mobile: +972-5-28704261
> Email: eliezer at ngtech.co.il
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Rousskov [mailto:rousskov at measurement-factory.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 21, 2017 08:02
> To: Eliezer Croitoru <eliezer at ngtech.co.il>; 'Kinkie' <gkinkie at gmail.com>; squid-dev at lists.squid-cache.org
> Subject: Re: [squid-dev] Bzr to git migration schedule
>
> On 07/20/2017 02:52 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
>> And... I must say that I am experiencing something weird with the wiki in the last month or more.
>> I mean that for example I received the message in the top left side of the wiki:
>> "Thank you for your changes. Your attention to detail is appreciated.
>> Only minutes after I already seen the page exists in another tab.
>> Should I open a new bug in the bugzilla?
>
> I have already whined to NOC about this problem. They were going to look at it soon. If you do not see improvements for another week or so, it may be a good idea to file a bug report with Bugzilla.
>
> Alex.
>
>
>> From: Kinkie [mailto:gkinkie at gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2017 10:59
>> To: Amos Jeffries <squid3 at treenet.co.nz>; Eliezer Croitoru
>> <eliezer at ngtech.co.il>; squid-dev at lists.squid-cache.org
>> Subject: Re: [squid-dev] Bzr to git migration schedule
>>
>> I believe we are talking about updating the pages that reference bzr
>> with pages that reference the current repositories and best practices
>>
>> On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 at 08:27, Eliezer Croitoru <mailto:eliezer at ngtech.co.il> wrote:
>> I didn't knew we are trying to "re-write" the wiki.
>> To what scale are we talking?
>> Mover everything from the http://wiki.squid-cache.org to github or just specific articles?
>>
>> Eliezer
>>
>> ----
>> Eliezer Croitoru
>> Linux System Administrator
>> Mobile: +972-5-28704261
>> Email: mailto:eliezer at ngtech.co.il
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: squid-dev
>> [mailto:mailto:squid-dev-bounces at lists.squid-cache.org] On Behalf Of
>> Amos Jeffries
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 11:59
>> To: mailto:squid-dev at lists.squid-cache.org
>> Subject: Re: [squid-dev] Bzr to git migration schedule
>>
>> On 18/07/17 16:40, Alex Rousskov wrote:
>>> On 07/15/2017 10:43 PM, Alex Rousskov wrote:
>>>> On 07/11/2017 10:20 PM, Alex Rousskov wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>    2017-07-11: No more new tags in the official bzr repo.
>>>>>    2017-07-13: No more new commits(*) in the official bzr repo.
>>>>>    2017-07-14: Migration starts.
>>>>>    2017-07-15: Anticipated optimistic migration end.
>>>>>    2017-07-18: Anticipated pessimistic migration end.
>>>>>
>>>>> All times are noon UTC.
>>>
>>>
>>>> The migration steps are done. According to the automated tests, all
>>>> bzr and git commits match (except for bzr commits containing empty
>>>> directories, as expected). However, I suggest _not_ declaring the
>>>> migration over yet and keeping both the old bzr and the new git
>>>> repository intact for 24 hours in case somebody notices problems
>>>> with the new official git repository at
>>>>
>>>>      https://github.com/squid-cache/squid
>>>
>>> I think we should declare the migration over, and the official
>>> repository to be at the above Github URL.
>>
>> +1.
>>
>>>
>>> I saw no problem reports about the new repository. We found and fixed
>>> one bug in the migration tool when migrating some of the Factory
>>> branches, but that bug did not affect the official repository which
>>> has a simpler structure. We could still go back to bzr in the face of
>>> disaster, but I hope that would not be necessary.
>>>
>>> Needless to say, this git migration is just the first step towards
>>> decent Project QA. The next steps are updating various maintenance
>>> scripts (thank you, Amos, for working on that) and pre-commit build
>>> tests of pull requests (Eduard is leading that effort). The basic
>>> build test enabled on Github should detect many serious problems
>>> today, but I hope to see a lot more powerful Jenkins-driven tests in the coming weeks.
>>>
>>
>> We also need someone to lead the wiki re-writing, most of the
>> DeveloperResources mentioning the repository and how-to for certain
>> development activities.
>>
>>
>> Amos
>> _______________________________________________
>> squid-dev mailing list
>> mailto:squid-dev at lists.squid-cache.org
>> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> squid-dev mailing list
>> mailto:squid-dev at lists.squid-cache.org
>> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-dev
>>
>
>



-- 
    Francesco


More information about the squid-dev mailing list