[squid-dev] [RFC] Auth design changes

Kinkie gkinkie at gmail.com
Fri Oct 31 09:06:36 UTC 2014


I suspect that the mailing list is configured to reply to sender by default.
Please everyone reply all when answering, we'll check and fix the
mailing list configuration asap.

On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 3:40 AM, Eliezer Croitoru <eliezer at ngtech.co.il> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Am I missing something?
>
> I see couple messages in the thread but only from amos.
>
> On 10/23/2014 08:12 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>> On 23/10/2014 6:05 p.m., Henrik Nordström wrote:
>>>> tor 2014-10-23 klockan 12:35 +1300 skrev Amos Jeffries:
>>>>
>>>>>> Aye, do you know where I could find any documentation on
>>>>>> how it is/was supposed to work?
>>>>
>>>> There is no RFC on it. But it worked the same as Negotiate,
>>>> just using raw GSSAPI blobs without the Microsoft Negotiate
>>>> SSP wrapper.
>> Okay I think it will fit nicely in the proposed design.
>>
>> Amos
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUUvaYAAoJENxnfXtQ8ZQUTB4IAIVU9Nz+AynNkOuSJP65GKMT
> SrjbFcWudjpmUiaOYNBt3lBS/du2CZsyexXUOyskikUAOaneVm+bICNBxmSwVaBl
> jZZm1Wf+zZYRr5JaSg5rBN1+y7nq6mv02C9g5Mc9kcX+TWjvnoX0liFw3IW+S4Fm
> eJAXrdB7bPW1Q6Bngq0z1SCzELVIwxtrqTRw1Q12D3utKkq+3o6CYvP3WgHUeOtN
> g0RAMSVIdlG2r9e/VWMOh7JfT8H6VaAoouHlYfeTLIFmJXseDY2FZsT5riss30kG
> l8jzJ4ZUmWo5k6znu496dUr26m5Y6gfMhasuv8UhorcOgIRSR2xuBa2GX+wgzoI=
> =GPSu
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> squid-dev mailing list
> squid-dev at lists.squid-cache.org
> http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-dev



-- 
    Francesco


More information about the squid-dev mailing list