<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div>Below I leave the link. I think that with this you could achieve your goal. In this project there are more things that you might not want to use or maybe you do. To begin I believe that it is well.</div><div><br></div><div><ul><li>High availability load balancing frontend between users and backend proxy nodes.</li><li>VIP (floating IP) for the load balancers.</li><li>Automatic configuration script for internal routing.</li><li>Proxy pool with integrated Kerberos and LDAP authentication in Active Directory</li><li>Domain, IP, and port filtering</li><li>Active Directory group browsing permissions</li><li>Navigation reports by cost centers and/or individual users</li><li>Bandwidth usage control per user.</li></ul></div><div><a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1L3HiYs0LXaDZJOEHXVz8WrRFeJXXUBzU/view?usp=sharing">https://drive.google.com/file/d/1L3HiYs0LXaDZJOEHXVz8WrRFeJXXUBzU/view?usp=sharing</a></div><div><br></div><div>Any question you may have, please reply with a copy to SQUID's mailing list in order to share with the community of users information that they may find useful.</div><div><br></div><div>Best regards,</div><div>Gabriel</div></div></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">El mié., 30 de sep. de 2020 a la(s) 05:12, Rafał Stanilewicz (<a href="mailto:rst@fomar.com.pl">rst@fomar.com.pl</a>) escribió:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Hi Gabriel, <div><br></div><div>although I do not know Spanish, a few of my friends do. Also, the most important pieces will be code samples, which do not need translation. So if you would be so kind and share the manual with me, I'd appreciate it very much!<div><br></div><div>Rafal </div></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 at 23:07, Service MV <<a href="mailto:service.mv@gmail.com" target="_blank">service.mv@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto"><div dir="auto">Hi Rafal, if you wish I've a manual redacted in SPANISH for build a VM whit Debian 10.5 running SQUID compiled from source, with kerberos and LDAP authentication, plus AD groups authorizations.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><div dir="auto">I haven't had time to translate it into English yet.</div><div dir="auto">Let me know if it works for you and I'll share it with you.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Best regards,</div><div dir="auto">Gabriel</div><div dir="auto"><br></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">El lun., 28 sep. 2020 10:19, Rafał Stanilewicz <<a href="mailto:rst@fomar.com.pl" target="_blank">rst@fomar.com.pl</a>> escribió:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Hello, <div><br></div><div>I'm planning the
deployment of web proxy in my environment. It's not very big, around 80 typical windows 10 workstations, active directory, plus some DMZ servers. For now, there is very basic L7 inspection on the edge firewall. </div><div><br></div><div>I plan to use two separate squid instances, one for explicit proxy traffic, forced by AD GPO settings, and second for traffic still being sent directly to the Internet (as several applications we use tend to ignore the system proxy settings). The first instance will use (hopefully) AD authentication, while the second will use only srcIP-based rules. I will be grateful for any comments, what should I focus on, or some quirks - I've never deployed squid from scratch. </div><div><br></div><div>But my main point of writing is:<div><br></div><div>I'd like to get some numbers about squid-introduced latency of getting some particular web resource. Is there any benchmarking program I could use? I'd like to see what is the current latency of getting the resource without any proxying, then of getting the same resource with explicit proxy settings, then of implicit (intercepting) proxy option, as well as for different options of caching. </div><div><br></div><div>How should I start? Is there any software I can use to measure that, besides analysis of HAR files? </div><div><br></div><div>So far, I used squid only in home environment, and without a need for granular measurement. </div><div><br></div><div>Best regards, </div><div><br></div><div>Rafal Stanilewicz</div><div></div><div><br></div></div></div>
_______________________________________________<br>
squid-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users</a><br>
</blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr">Zanim wydrukujesz, pomyśl o środowisku. </div>
</blockquote></div>