<html><head></head><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif;font-size:13px"><div>Thought I'd try getting this to work in Chrome too. NOTHING I try makes it work in Chrome. Isn't running this from the Windows command line supposed to work?</div><div><br></div><div dir="ltr">chrome --proxy-server=https://mydomain:myport</div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr">When I do this, it runs Chrome, but it's still not going through the proxy despite Firefox on the same computer working just fine!<br></div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1495713455065_2811"><span></span></div><div class="qtdSeparateBR" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1495713455065_2760"><br><br></div><div class="yahoo_quoted" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1495713455065_2724" style="display: block;"> <div style="font-family: Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif; font-size: 13px;" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1495713455065_2723"> <div style="font-family: HelveticaNeue, Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, Lucida Grande, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1495713455065_2722"> <div dir="ltr" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1495713455065_2721"> <font id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1495713455065_2720" size="2" face="Arial"> <hr size="1"> <b><span style="font-weight:bold;">From:</span></b> Amos Jeffries <squid3@treenet.co.nz><br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> j m <acctforjunk@yahoo.com>; "squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org" <squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org> <br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Wednesday, May 24, 2017 5:15 PM<br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> Re: [squid-users] SSL bump, SSL intercept, explicit, secure proxy, what is it called?<br> </font> </div> <div class="y_msg_container" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1495713455065_2840"><br><div dir="ltr" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1495713455065_2839">On 25/05/17 09:01, j m wrote:<br clear="none">> Some more info: I tried this on Firefox 53 and got more feedback, but <br clear="none">> still doesn't work. Per the recommendation on bugzilla (bug 378637), <br clear="none">> I put <a shape="rect" href="https://myaddress:myport " target="_blank">https://myaddress:myport </a><<a shape="rect" href="https://myaddress:myport/" target="_blank" id="yui_3_16_0_ym19_1_1495713455065_2907">https://myaddress:myport/</a>> into <br clear="none">> firefox and it gives me a "Your connection is not secure". So I add <br clear="none">> the exception, and it then displays the squid message "ERROR The <br clear="none">> requested URL could not be retrieved", as expected.<br clear="none">><br clear="none">> So I add the proxy to Firefox (in Advanced, Network, Settings) as the <br clear="none">> HTTP Proxy....doesn't work, "The proxy server is refusing <br clear="none">> connections". I then put https:// in front of the address, then it's <br clear="none">> "Server not found". I then add it as SSL Proxy. It appears to be <br clear="none">> working, but really it's simply not using the proxy at all because I <br clear="none">> stopped squid and it made no difference.<br clear="none">><br clear="none"><br clear="none">The settings you enter via the Browser GUI are exclusively for setting <br clear="none">up plain-text proxy connections.<br clear="none"><br clear="none">"SSL Proxy" in the Browser GUI means the proxy to send any SSL/TLS <br clear="none">traffic *through* (using CONNECT tunnel).<br clear="none"><br clear="none"><br clear="none">> The link you reference on getting Firefox to work with this refers to <br clear="none">> Firefox 33, so by now I'd think I could directly add the proxy to the <br clear="none">> normal place in Firefox options?<br clear="none"><br clear="none">Unfortunately that would be far too sensible. It only took ~20 years to <br clear="none">get them to accept any kind of TLS/SSL security on the Browser<->proxy <br clear="none">connection in the first place.<br clear="none"><br clear="none">I really wish that was a joke, but I've long ago given up on expecting <br clear="none">sanity from Browser people. For the topic in question, the argument <br clear="none">behind not adding a simple tick-box to that somewhat hidden GUI popup to <br clear="none">enable TLS/SSL to a proxy ... is unwaveringly that "changing the UI <br clear="none">would cause a lot of end users some confusion and pain" or words to that <br clear="none">affect - and yet I've lost count of how many graphical redesigns have <br clear="none">happened to the things those end-users are directly seeing and using on <br clear="none">a daily basis. But one semi-hidden tick box, oh no!<div class="yqt2534523978" id="yqtfd99119"><br clear="none"><br clear="none">Amos<br clear="none"><br clear="none"></div></div><br><br></div> </div> </div> </div></div></body></html>