<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 1:00 PM, <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:squid-users-request@lists.squid-cache.org" target="_blank">squid-users-request@lists.squid-cache.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Send squid-users mailing list submissions to<br>
<a href="mailto:squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org">squid-users@lists.squid-cache.<wbr>org</a><br>
<br>
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>
<a href="http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.squid-cache.org/<wbr>listinfo/squid-users</a><br>
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to<br>
<a href="mailto:squid-users-request@lists.squid-cache.org">squid-users-request@lists.<wbr>squid-cache.org</a><br>
<br>
You can reach the person managing the list at<br>
<a href="mailto:squid-users-owner@lists.squid-cache.org">squid-users-owner@lists.squid-<wbr>cache.org</a><br>
<br>
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>
than "Re: Contents of squid-users digest..."<br>
<br>
<br>
Today's Topics:<br>
<br>
1. Squid Cache to Users at Full Bandwidth (christian brendan)<br>
2. Re: Squid Cache to Users at Full Bandwidth (Yuri Voinov)<br>
3. Re: Squid Cache to Users at Full Bandwidth (Antony Stone)<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<wbr>------------------------------<wbr>----------<br>
<br>
Message: 1<br>
Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 16:18:33 +0100<br>
From: christian brendan <<a href="mailto:bosscb.chrisbren@gmail.com">bosscb.chrisbren@gmail.com</a>><br>
To: <a href="mailto:squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org">squid-users@lists.squid-cache.<wbr>org</a>,<br>
<a href="mailto:squid-users-owner@lists.squid-cache.org">squid-users-owner@lists.squid-<wbr>cache.org</a><br>
Subject: [squid-users] Squid Cache to Users at Full Bandwidth<br>
Message-ID:<br>
<CAHptoxrgO2CbtapCTnzf=<a href="mailto:uWcM3MsH7Gzh2AcxCBqeZn_tsUO%2Bw@mail.gmail.com">uWcM3Ms<wbr>H7Gzh2AcxCBqeZn_tsUO+w@mail.<wbr>gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
<br>
Squid Version 3.5.20<br>
Cento 7<br>
Mikrotik RouterBoard v 6.39.1<br>
Users IP: <a href="http://192.168.1.0/24" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">192.168.1.0/24</a><br>
Squid ip: 192.168.2.1<br>
<br>
Traffic to squid is routed<br>
<br>
i would like users to have full LAN bandwidth access to squid server, i<br>
have tried simple queue on mikrotik but it seems not to be working.<br>
<br>
Any guide will be appreciated.<br>
<br>
Best Regards<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/attachments/20170505/f49ed72e/attachment-0001.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.squid-cache.org/<wbr>pipermail/squid-users/<wbr>attachments/20170505/f49ed72e/<wbr>attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 2<br>
Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 23:46:29 +0600<br>
From: Yuri Voinov <<a href="mailto:yvoinov@gmail.com">yvoinov@gmail.com</a>><br>
To: <a href="mailto:squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org">squid-users@lists.squid-cache.<wbr>org</a><br>
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid Cache to Users at Full Bandwidth<br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:a63ba7ad-61d2-f16d-5623-235b108d24d7@gmail.com">a63ba7ad-61d2-f16d-5623-<wbr>235b108d24d7@gmail.com</a>><br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"<br>
<br>
<a href="http://wiki.squid-cache.org/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://wiki.squid-cache.org/</a><br>
<br>
<br>
05.05.2017 21:18, christian brendan пишет:<br>
> Squid Version 3.5.20<br>
> Cento 7<br>
> Mikrotik RouterBoard v 6.39.1<br>
> Users IP: <a href="http://192.168.1.0/24" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">192.168.1.0/24</a> <<a href="http://192.168.1.0/24" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://192.168.1.0/24</a>><br>
> Squid ip: 192.168.2.1<br>
><br>
> Traffic to squid is routed<br>
><br>
> i would like users to have full LAN bandwidth access to squid server,<br>
> i have tried simple queue on mikrotik but it seems not to be working.<br>
><br>
> Any guide will be appreciated.<br>
><br>
> Best Regards<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
> squid-users mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org">squid-users@lists.squid-cache.<wbr>org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.squid-cache.org/<wbr>listinfo/squid-users</a><br>
<br>
--<br>
Bugs to the Future<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <<a href="http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/attachments/20170505/b26dda8f/attachment-0001.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.squid-cache.org/<wbr>pipermail/squid-users/<wbr>attachments/20170505/b26dda8f/<wbr>attachment-0001.html</a>><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>
Name: 0x613DEC46.asc<br>
Type: application/pgp-keys<br>
Size: 2437 bytes<br>
Desc: not available<br>
URL: <<a href="http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/attachments/20170505/b26dda8f/attachment-0001.key" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.squid-cache.org/<wbr>pipermail/squid-users/<wbr>attachments/20170505/b26dda8f/<wbr>attachment-0001.key</a>><br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...<br>
Name: signature.asc<br>
Type: application/pgp-signature<br>
Size: 473 bytes<br>
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature<br>
URL: <<a href="http://lists.squid-cache.org/pipermail/squid-users/attachments/20170505/b26dda8f/attachment-0001.sig" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.squid-cache.org/<wbr>pipermail/squid-users/<wbr>attachments/20170505/b26dda8f/<wbr>attachment-0001.sig</a>><br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 3<br>
Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 19:04:39 +0100<br>
From: Antony Stone <<a href="mailto:Antony.Stone@squid.open.source.it">Antony.Stone@squid.open.<wbr>source.it</a>><br>
To: <a href="mailto:squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org">squid-users@lists.squid-cache.<wbr>org</a><br>
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Squid Cache to Users at Full Bandwidth<br>
Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:201705051904.39473.Antony.Stone@squid.open.source.it">201705051904.39473.Antony.<wbr>Stone@squid.open.source.it</a>><br>
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15"<br>
<br>
On Friday 05 May 2017 at 16:18:33, christian brendan wrote:<br>
<br>
> Squid Version 3.5.20<br>
> Cento 7<br>
> Mikrotik RouterBoard v 6.39.1<br>
> Users IP: <a href="http://192.168.1.0/24" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">192.168.1.0/24</a><br>
> Squid ip: 192.168.2.1<br>
><br>
> Traffic to squid is routed<br>
><br>
> i would like users to have full LAN bandwidth access to squid server, i<br>
> have tried simple queue on mikrotik but it seems not to be working.<br>
<br>
How does it "not seem to be working"?<br>
<br>
A "queue" on the Mikrotik would normally be used to restrict bandwidth, not<br>
increase it. Please give details of how you have implemented this queue.<br>
<br>
A few further questions:<br>
<br>
1. Is Squid running on the Routerboard, or on a rather more capable machine?<br>
<br>
2. If the client machines access the Internet directly (ie: not via Squid), do<br>
they also go via the Routerboard?<br>
<br>
3. How are you measuring bandwidth for the clients?<br>
<br>
<br>
Antony.<br>
<br>
--<br>
I thought I had type A blood, but it turned out to be a typo.<br>
<br>
Please reply to the list;<br>
please *don't* CC me.<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Subject: Digest Footer<br>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
squid-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org">squid-users@lists.squid-cache.<wbr>org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.squid-cache.org/<wbr>listinfo/squid-users</a><br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
End of squid-users Digest, Vol 33, Issue 24<br>
******************************<wbr>*************<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif"><b>1. <span style="font-size:12.8px;font-family:arial,sans-serif">How does it "not seem to be working"?</span></b></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif">Simple Queue on Mikrotik</div><div class="gmail_default"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif">name="pppoe" target=<a href="http://192.168.1.0/24">192.168.1.0/24</a> dst=<span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px">192.168.2.1</span>/32 parent=none packet-marks="" priority=1/1 </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif"> queue=default/default limit-at=0/0 max-limit=0/0 burst-limit=0/0 burst-threshold=0/0 burst-time=0s/0s </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif"> bucket-size=0.1/0.1 total-queue=default </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif">With this queue in place users still connect to the squid server with their predefined bandwidth limit, Eg: 1mbps to and from the squid server.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif"><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px"><b> 2. Is Squid running on the Routerboard, or on a rather more capable machine?</b></span><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif"><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:12.8px"><br></span></div><div class="gmail_default"><span style="font-size:12.8px">Squid is running on CentOS 7, Routerboard is doing the routing to squid.</span></div><div class="gmail_default"><span style="font-size:12.8px"><b><br></b></span></div><div class="gmail_default"><b><span style="font-size:12.8px">2. If the client machines access the Internet directly (ie: not via Squid), do</span><br style="font-size:12.8px"><span style="font-size:12.8px">they also go via the Routerboard?</span><br></b></div><div class="gmail_default"><br></div><div class="gmail_default">Yes</div><div class="gmail_default"><span style="font-size:12.8px">All traffics goes through Routerboad (traffic to squid and to internet goes through Routerboard)</span></div><div class="gmail_default"><span style="font-size:12.8px"><br></span></div><div class="gmail_default"><span style="font-size:12.8px"><b>3. How are you measuring bandwidth for the clients?</b></span><span style="font-size:12.8px"><br></span></div><div class="gmail_default"><span style="font-size:12.8px"><b><br></b></span></div><div class="gmail_default"><span style="font-size:12.8px">By re-downloading a file that has been cached, Which i believe the first download should be on 1mbps predefined bandwidth and sub-sequence download of the same file should be on 100mbps or even 50mbps at a full bandwidth to the client.</span></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif"><br></div><div style="font-family:georgia,serif">Best Regards.</div></div></div><br></div></div>