<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p>HTTPS is not a problem, if not a problem to install the proxy
certificate to the clients. <br>
</p>
<p>The problem in combating caching YT by Google.<br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">19.11.2016 21:41, Yuri Voinov пишет:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:eb7a6f29-267f-6b5d-fe17-7e131df34f7f@gmail.com"
type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<p><br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">19.11.2016 21:35, Amos Jeffries
пишет:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:d72e32e7-d9e9-281a-6e7e-ac1e577c0121@treenet.co.nz"
type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">19.11.2016 20:56, Bakhtiyor Homidov пишет:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">thanks, yuri,
just found <a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://cachevideos.com/">https://cachevideos.com/</a>, what do you think about this?
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">On 20/11/2016 4:17 a.m., Yuri Voinov wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">This is fake.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Only for strange definitions of "fake".
It is simply an old helper from before YouTube became all-HTTPS. It
should still work okay for any of the video sites that are still using HTTP.</pre>
</blockquote>
YT uses cache-preventing scheme for videos relatively long time
(after they finished use Flash videos). So, no one - excluding
Google itself - can cache it now. Especially for mobile devices.
I've spent last two years to learn this. So, anyone who talk he
can cache YT is lies.<br>
<br>
As I explain here why: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
class="gmail-m_-1335690988452641851moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/DynamicContent/YouTube/Discussion"
target="_blank">http://wiki.squid-cache.org/<wbr>ConfigExamples/DynamicContent/<wbr>YouTube/Discussion</a><br>
<br>
All another videos - well, this is a bit difficult - but possible
to cache.<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:d72e32e7-d9e9-281a-6e7e-ac1e577c0121@treenet.co.nz"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">If you look at the features list it clearly says:
"No support for HTTPS (secure HTTP) caching."</pre>
</blockquote>
HTTPS itself in most cases can't be easy cached by vanilla squid.<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:d72e32e7-d9e9-281a-6e7e-ac1e577c0121@treenet.co.nz"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
Amos
_______________________________________________
squid-users mailing list
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org">squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org</a>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users">http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
Cats - delicious. You just do not know how to cook them.</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
Cats - delicious. You just do not know how to cook them.</div>
</body>
</html>